Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 16, 2010·United Center, Chicago

Buffalo Sabres 3, Chicago Blackhawks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 82% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF219110012341
CHI191725421

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:25CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:52BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Steve Montador, Thomas Vanek · Snap, 0.43 xG1–1
  3. P1 7:07BUFPaul GaustadAssists: Patrick Kaleta · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:04CHIMarian HossaAssists: Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:15BUFCody McCormickAssists: Jochen Hecht, Tim Connolly · Wrist, 0.45 xG3–2
  6. P3 9:36CHIDave BollandAssists: Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:52CHIPatrick SharpPPGWGAssists: Tomas Kopecky, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 0:51CHITomas Kopecky: Interference2 min
  2. P1 15:07BUFDrew Stafford: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 18:03CHIJake Dowell: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:28CHIViktor Stalberg: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 6:28BUFChris Butler: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 6:28BUFRob Niedermayer: Elbowing2 min
  7. P2 8:32CHIMarian Hossa: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 8:07BUFChris Butler: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 8:07CHIJonathan Toews: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 10:53BUFJordan Leopold: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 16:09CHITomas Kopecky: Boarding2 min
  12. P3 16:51CHINick Boynton: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 17:13BUFJordan Leopold: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 19:27CHIDuncan Keith: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bolland won the faceoff against Connolly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCHI
41Shots on goal21
4.1Expected goals2.1
70Shot attempts49
21Faceoffs won40
6Power plays4
12Penalty minutes16
26Hits38
15Blocked shots18
5Giveaways12
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Connolly – McCormick9:17

    xG 0.81–0.15 (84%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  2. Roy – Vanek – Stafford10:11

    xG 0.71–0.38 (65%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  3. Niedermayer – Grier – Ennis9:47

    xG 0.66–0.35 (65%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  4. Gaustad – Kaleta – Gerbe6:21

    xG 0.36–0.09 (80%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontador – Butler11:36

    xG 0.87–0.17 (84%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

  2. Rivet – Sekera12:50

    xG 0.98–0.31 (76%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  3. Leopold – Myers12:39

    xG 0.78–0.60 (56%)attempts 9–15goals 1–2

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestPisani – Bolland – Bickell6:49

    xG 0.28–0.08 (78%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Hossa – Kopecky – Sharp2:47

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Brouwer – Toews – Kane4:52

    xG 0.04–0.11 (28%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Pisani – Bolland – Stalberg2:09

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Cullimore – Boynton2:29

    xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  2. Boynton – Hjalmarsson11:29

    xG 0.17–0.49 (26%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook16:23

    xG 0.39–0.73 (35%)attempts 21–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.1 xGBUF 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #154 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.27 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 82% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).