Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 19, 2010·Verizon Center, Washington

Boston Bruins 3, Washington Capitals 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 54% of the time.

WSH winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS280815321
WSH01018018136

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:12BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Nathan Horton, Milan Lucic · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:57BOSMilan LucicGWGAssists: Johnny Boychuk, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:42WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Jason Chimera, Matt Hendricks · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:08BOSMatt HunwickAssists: Dennis Seidenberg, Blake Wheeler · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–1
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:15BOSGregory Campbell: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:15WSHMatt Hendricks: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:53WSHAlexander Semin: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 3:31BOSGregory Campbell: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:07BOSMark Stuart: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 8:59WSHTomas Fleischmann: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 10:06WSHJohn Erskine: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 15:03WSHDavid Steckel: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 18:27BOSZdeno Chara: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 9:23WSHJohn Erskine: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 9:23BOSMilan Lucic: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 18:40BOSGregory Campbell: High sticking2 min
  13. P3 18:40BOSGregory Campbell: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Campbell won the faceoff against Backstrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSWSH
21Shots on goal36
2.3Expected goals2.2
42Shot attempts70
27Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
20Penalty minutes18
23Hits33
19Blocked shots12
10Giveaways8
1Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestHorton – Krejci – Lucic8:25

    xG 0.50–0.17 (75%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  2. Recchi – Ryder – Seguin10:29

    xG 0.55–0.40 (58%)attempts 8–13goals 0–1

  3. Bergeron – Wheeler – Caron10:29

    xG 0.28–0.36 (44%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  4. Thornton – Campbell – Marchand8:13

    xG 0.03–0.26 (11%)attempts 1–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Boychuk12:11

    xG 0.51–0.28 (64%)attempts 11–16goals 2–0

  2. Ference – Hunwick3:09

    xG 0.51–0.29 (64%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Seidenberg – Hunwick4:45

    xG 0.10–0.02 (83%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestLaich – Fleischmann – Semin10:59

    xG 0.37–0.29 (57%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. Semin – Ovechkin – Backstrom2:04

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Knuble – Ovechkin – Backstrom9:21

    xG 0.36–0.43 (45%)attempts 13–11goals 0–2

  4. Chimera – Fehr – Johansson8:02

    xG 0.12–0.53 (18%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestErskine – Carlson11:53

    xG 0.76–0.08 (90%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0

  2. Poti – Sloan12:13

    xG 0.19–0.23 (46%)attempts 10–10goals 0–1

  3. Schultz – Alzner11:16

    xG 0.31–0.99 (24%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.2 xGBOS 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 18/100 · #968 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.92 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 54% of the time.

WSH winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).