Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 21, 2010·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Nashville Predators 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT0721111713438
NSH161101503324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:53NSHDavid LegwandAssists: Jordin Tootoo, Joel Ward · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:54PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Mike Comrie, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:03NSHCody FransonPPAssists: Francis Bouillon, Martin Erat · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:51PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Chris Kunitz, Andrew Hutchinson · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:08NSHPatric HornqvistAssists: Colin Wilson, Martin Erat · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:56PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang · Slap, 0.14 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:49PITKris LetangGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Tyler Kennedy · Slap, 0.03 xG4–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 7:43PITPascal Dupuis: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:17NSHDavid Legwand: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 3:42PITEric Tangradi: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 6:47PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 8:28NSHKevin Klein: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 8:28PITDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 8:28NSHKevin Klein: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:22NSHCody Franson: Interference2 min
  9. P2 18:43PITMike Rupp: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 2:13NSHNick Spaling: Interference2 min
  11. P3 10:54NSHMartin Erat: Interference2 min
  12. P3 10:54PITAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 16:04NSHPekka Rinne: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Legwand
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNSH
38Shots on goal24
3.2Expected goals1.9
62Shot attempts36
30Faceoffs won28
5Power plays4
15Penalty minutes17
26Hits24
10Blocked shots13
8Giveaways9
10Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestComrie – Malkin – Letestu4:30

    xG 0.55–0.02 (97%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Cooke – Talbot – Kennedy4:26

    xG 0.40–0.19 (68%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Malkin – Crosby4:42

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–0goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Dupuis – Talbot3:10

    xG 0.01–0.04 (13%)attempts 1–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang10:52

    xG 0.82–0.55 (60%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

  2. Hutchinson – Goligoski3:36

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Hutchinson – Lovejoy4:36

    xG 0.15–0.02 (91%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Ward – Tootoo11:37

    xG 0.43–0.28 (60%)attempts 4–11goals 1–0

  2. Smithson – Kostitsyn – Spaling6:37

    xG 0.31–0.20 (60%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  3. Sullivan – O'Reilly – Hornqvist8:38

    xG 0.26–0.15 (63%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

  4. Dumont – Erat – Wilson6:51

    xG 0.31–0.27 (54%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSulzer – Franson10:54

    xG 0.59–0.25 (70%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Bouillon – Weber11:26

    xG 0.47–0.41 (54%)attempts 5–11goals 1–1

  3. Bouillon – Klein2:03

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 1.9 xGPIT 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #88 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.49 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).