Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 22, 2010·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Chicago Blackhawks 2, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI181908225
STL1121729428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:31STLDavid PerronAssists: T.J. Oshie · Snap, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:26CHIPatrick SharpPPAssists: Duncan Keith, Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:12STLDavid PerronAssists: T.J. Oshie, Carlo Colaiacovo · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:35CHIBrent SeabrookAssists: Troy Brouwer, Bryan Bickell · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:01STLRoman PolakGWGUnassisted · Slap, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:57STLPatrik BerglundPPAssists: Andy McDonald, Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.26 xG2–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:58STLB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:58CHIJake Dowell: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:13STLJay McClement: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 4:01CHIJack Skille: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 7:35STLErik Johnson: Interference2 min
  6. P2 13:41STLBrad Winchester: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 13:41CHIJohn Scott: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 11:20STLRoman Polak: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 11:20CHITomas Kopecky: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 11:20STLRoman Polak: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 18:07CHIBrent Seabrook: Delaying game2 min · PPG
  12. P3 19:45CHIMarian Hossa: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← CHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISTL
25Shots on goal28
1.8Expected goals2.5
48Shot attempts51
29Faceoffs won23
3Power plays3
18Penalty minutes18
15Hits22
10Blocked shots17
8Giveaways5
6Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. Pisani – Bolland – Bickell5:30

    xG 0.21–0.17 (56%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Sharp – Brouwer – Kane11:37

    xG 0.21–0.22 (49%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Dowell – Skille – Stalberg2:12

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Hossa – Kopecky – Sharp2:26

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook20:42

    xG 0.97–0.67 (59%)attempts 20–10goals 0–0

  2. Boynton – Hjalmarsson16:57

    xG 0.55–0.53 (51%)attempts 15–17goals 0–1

  3. Boynton – Keith2:22

    xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Backes – Oshie – Perron13:39

    xG 0.77–0.73 (51%)attempts 10–14goals 1–0

  2. Winchester – Crombeen – Sobotka5:09

    xG 0.09–0.10 (47%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. McDonald – Boyes – Berglund12:00

    xG 0.31–0.33 (49%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  4. McClement – Steen – D'Agostini11:52

    xG 0.13–0.22 (37%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestColaiacovo – Johnson16:30

    xG 0.56–0.28 (67%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  2. Brewer – Polak18:00

    xG 0.89–0.81 (53%)attempts 14–16goals 2–0

  3. Jackman – Pietrangelo13:59

    xG 0.27–0.43 (39%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.5 xGCHI 1.8 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 47/100 · #611 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.42 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).