Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 23, 2010·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Nashville Predators 1, Dallas Stars 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 72% of the time.

DAL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH1110508124
DAL0801309030

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:42NSHCal O'ReillyGWGAssists: Shea Weber, Steve Sullivan · Wrist, 0.30 xG1–0
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 19:39DALMatt Niskanen: Interference2 min
  2. P2 9:28NSHMartin Erat: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 16:22NSHJ-P Dumont: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P3 4:59NSHDavid Legwand: Interference2 min
  5. P3 7:37DALTom Wandell: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ribeiro won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHDAL
24Shots on goal30
1.5Expected goals2.6
44Shot attempts58
24Faceoffs won33
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
25Hits22
15Blocked shots12
10Giveaways13
7Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDumont – Erat – Wilson7:24

    xG 0.28–0.01 (97%)attempts 14–2goals 0–0

  2. Smithson – Tootoo – Spaling2:11

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Erat – Ward – Wilson2:04

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Sullivan – O'Reilly – Hornqvist12:04

    xG 0.44–0.46 (49%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSulzer – Franson9:35

    xG 0.25–0.04 (86%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Sulzer – Laakso2:24

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Klein – O'Brien12:45

    xG 0.30–0.54 (36%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Wandell – Benn10:55

    xG 0.40–0.17 (70%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  2. Richards – Eriksson – Neal12:57

    xG 0.27–0.15 (64%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Barch – Petersen – Segal4:34

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  4. Morrow – Ribeiro – Burish13:11

    xG 0.73–0.79 (48%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSkrastins – Niskanen13:29

    xG 0.54–0.30 (65%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

  2. Woywitka – Daley13:17

    xG 0.33–0.23 (59%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  3. Robidas – Grossmann10:35

    xG 0.19–0.43 (31%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.6 xGNSH 1.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 7/100 · #1114 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 1 goal in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 72% of the time.

DAL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).