Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 23, 2010·Pepsi Center, Denver

Los Angeles Kings 6, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 57% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK28212210630
COL212110110432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:12LAKAlexei PonikarovskyAssists: Michal Handzus, Wayne Simmonds · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:17COLMilan HejdukAssists: Matt Duchene, David Jones · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:15LAKAnze KopitarPPAssists: Andrei Loktionov, Jack Johnson · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P1 15:03COLPaul StastnyPPAssists: Milan Hejduk, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P2 4:58LAKBrad RichardsonAssists: Brayden Schenn, Willie Mitchell · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:15LAKDustin BrownPPAssists: Justin Williams · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–2
  7. P2 18:10COLPaul StastnyAssists: Chris Stewart · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:34COLMilan HejdukPPAssists: Paul Stastny, John-Michael Liles · Slap, 0.11 xG4–4
  9. P3 13:04LAKBrad RichardsonSHGWGAssists: Jarret Stoll · Slap, 0.09 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:05LAKBrad RichardsonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG6–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 10:26COLKyle Cumiskey: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 11:38LAKJustin Williams: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:38COLJohn-Michael Liles: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 11:53LAKAndrei Loktionov: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 14:21LAKMichal Handzus: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 17:42LAKRyan Smyth: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 2:21LAKDustin Brown: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 15:36COLRyan Wilson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 0:11COLMilan Hejduk: High sticking double minor4 min
  10. P3 5:01LAKJustin Williams: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P3 8:40LAKWayne Simmonds: Butt ending5 min · PPG
  12. P3 8:40LAKWayne Simmonds: Game misconduct10 min
  13. P3 17:59COLChris Stewart: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stoll won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKCOL
30Shots on goal32
2.2Expected goals1.9
51Shot attempts48
33Faceoffs won26
5Power plays7
30Penalty minutes15
19Hits15
7Blocked shots12
1Giveaways13
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Richardson – Kopitar4:30

    xG 0.38–0.09 (81%)attempts 13–3goals 1–0

  2. Brown – Kopitar – Loktionov4:33

    xG 0.14–0.03 (80%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Handzus – Ponikarovsky – Simmonds5:14

    xG 0.20–0.14 (58%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  4. Smyth – Williams – Stoll8:38

    xG 0.29–0.26 (52%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMitchell – Greene13:13

    xG 0.47–0.25 (66%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Scuderi – Johnson9:10

    xG 0.51–0.30 (63%)attempts 12–10goals 2–1

  3. Harrold – Drewiske7:11

    xG 0.25–0.12 (68%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestVan Der Gulik – Porter – McLeod3:12

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Hejduk – Jones – Duchene10:00

    xG 0.40–0.40 (50%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  3. Stastny – Stewart – Galiardi11:00

    xG 0.20–0.21 (49%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  4. Yip – Winnik – O'Reilly6:19

    xG 0.09–0.44 (17%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLiles – Holos11:19

    xG 0.45–0.28 (62%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  2. Hannan – Cumiskey4:53

    xG 0.16–0.21 (43%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Cumiskey – Holos2:10

    xG 0.02–0.08 (22%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.9 xGLAK 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #29 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.48 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 57% of the time.

COL winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).