Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 25, 2010·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Los Angeles Kings 3, Minnesota Wild 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
LAK11011308033334
MIN290705012222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:52MINJohn MaddenAssists: Clayton Stoner · Wrist, 0.47 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:42MINNick SchultzAssists: Mikko Koivu, Brent Burns · Slap, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:37LAKJarret StollPPAssists: Jack Johnson, Anze Kopitar · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:42LAKAnze KopitarPPAssists: Jack Johnson, Justin Williams · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Anze Kopitar scored
  2. 2. MIN Mikko Koivu scored
  3. 3. LAK Jack Johnson stopped
  4. 4. MIN Matt Cullen scored
  5. 5. LAK Jarret Stoll scored
  6. 6. MIN Marek Zidlicky stopped
  7. 7. LAK Justin Williams stopped
  8. 8. MIN Brent Burns stopped
  9. 9. LAK Michal Handzus scored
  10. 10. MIN Antti Miettinen stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:07MINClayton Stoner: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 9:01LAKKevin Westgarth: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 12:10MINBrent Burns: Interference2 min
  4. P1 17:06MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:09LAKAlexei Ponikarovsky: Holding2 min
  6. P1 19:18MINGuillaume Latendresse: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 8:12LAKDustin Brown: Illegal check to head5 min
  8. P2 8:12LAKDustin Brown: Game misconduct10 min
  9. P2 13:22MINBrad Staubitz: Interference2 min
  10. P2 18:40MINEric Nystrom: Boarding2 min · PPG
  11. P2 19:36MINMikko Koivu: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 0:53LAKJack Johnson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← LAK attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Madden won the faceoff against Stoll
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKMIN
34Shots on goal22
2.5Expected goals2.5
74Shot attempts55
38Faceoffs won39
7Power plays4
21Penalty minutes14
20Hits21
19Blocked shots19
9Giveaways11
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestSmyth – Williams – Stoll10:00

    xG 0.47–0.13 (78%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

  2. Brown – Richardson – Kopitar2:30

    xG 0.13–0.04 (75%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

  3. Handzus – Ponikarovsky – Richardson3:44

    xG 0.22–0.14 (61%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  4. Kopitar – Simmonds – Loktionov4:18

    xG 0.07–0.06 (54%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarrold – Drewiske7:58

    xG 0.25–0.03 (90%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Mitchell – Greene12:44

    xG 0.29–0.06 (82%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

  3. Scuderi – Johnson14:30

    xG 0.53–1.44 (27%)attempts 16–24goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestMadden – Nystrom – Clutterbuck9:05

    xG 0.79–0.20 (80%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Havlat – Latendresse8:25

    xG 0.59–0.26 (69%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  3. Kobasew – Brodziak – Staubitz2:07

    xG 0.00–0.01 (23%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Brunette – Miettinen – Koivu11:19

    xG 0.10–0.23 (30%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Burns12:23

    xG 0.73–0.17 (81%)attempts 20–10goals 1–0

  2. Stoner – Falk8:23

    xG 0.59–0.11 (84%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Zanon – Zidlicky12:03

    xG 0.22–0.73 (23%)attempts 6–19goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.5 xGLAK 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #401 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.57 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).