Mon, Nov 1, 2010·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia
Carolina Hurricanes 2, Philadelphia Flyers 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 74% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | 09 | 18 | 111 | 228 |
| PHI | 110 | 116 | 111 | 337 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 12:29PHIScott HartnellAssists: Jeff Carter, Ville Leino · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–1
- P2 3:05CARPatrick DwyerAssists: Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
- P2 11:21PHIClaude GirouxPPAssists: Mike Richards · Slap, 0.14 xG1–2
- P3 6:30PHIScott HartnellGWGAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Jeff Carter · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–3
- P3 19:33CARJoe CorvoAssists: Brandon Sutter, Tuomo Ruutu · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–3
Penalties (8)
- P1 0:33PHIBraydon Coburn: Tripping2 min
- P1 0:37CAREric Staal: Holding the stick2 min
- P1 9:40PHIBlair Betts: High sticking2 min
- P1 16:55CARJamie McBain: Holding2 min
- P1 19:33CARChad LaRose: Interference goalkeeper2 min
- P2 11:16CARJoni Pitkanen: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P2 13:40CARJay Harrison: Tripping2 min
- P3 7:57PHIChris Pronger: Boarding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Carter won the faceoff against Ruutu
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- Kostopoulos – Matsumoto – Tlusty4:54
xG 0.02–0.09 (20%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0
- Jokinen – LaRose – Staal13:32
xG 0.39–0.50 (44%)attempts 11–14goals 0–1
- Samsonov – Dwyer – Sutter8:38
xG 0.28–0.47 (37%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0
- Cole – Ruutu – Skinner11:33
xG 0.36–0.66 (35%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestCorvo – Harrison4:51
xG 0.44–0.04 (92%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0
- Harrison – Babchuk5:55
xG 0.27–0.14 (66%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0
- Corvo – Babchuk2:04
xG 0.03–0.07 (30%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- bestShelley – Betts – Carcillo7:13
xG 0.32–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0
- Richards – van Riemsdyk – Wellwood11:19
xG 0.67–0.44 (60%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1
- Hartnell – Carter – Leino12:12
xG 0.48–0.42 (53%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0
- Zherdev – Giroux – Powe9:14
xG 0.34–0.36 (49%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestTimonen – Coburn12:42
xG 0.63–0.20 (76%)attempts 13–9goals 2–0
- O'Donnell – Bartulis13:13
xG 0.42–0.15 (74%)attempts 14–17goals 0–0
- Pronger – Carle14:21
xG 0.77–0.95 (45%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 74% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PHI − CAR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).