Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 3, 2010·HSBC Arena, Buffalo

Boston Bruins 5, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS3121816526
BUF09112114235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:32BOSBrad MarchandSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:54BOSPatrice BergeronSHAssists: Brad Marchand, Gregory Campbell · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P1 16:54BOSBlake WheelerGWGAssists: Michael Ryder, Zdeno Chara · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–0
  4. P2 2:11BOSMichael RyderUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–0
  5. P2 16:39BUFDrew StaffordPPAssists: Tim Connolly, Jason Pominville · Snap, 0.28 xG4–1
  6. P3 15:26BUFAndrej SekeraUnassisted · Backhand, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:53BOSMilan LucicENAssists: David Krejci, Nathan Horton · Wrist, 0.61 xG5–2
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 2:49BOSMichael Ryder: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:15BOSDennis Seidenberg: Holding2 min
  3. P1 18:11BUFTim Connolly: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 5:20BUFTyler Myers: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 11:57BOSMark Stuart: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 11:57BOSMark Stuart: Fighting5 min · PPG
  7. P2 11:57BUFCody McCormick: Instigator2 min
  8. P2 11:57BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 11:57BUFCody McCormick: Misconduct10 min
  10. P2 14:58BOSBlake Wheeler: Slashing2 min
  11. P2 17:07BOSMilan Lucic: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 17:07BUFPatrick Kaleta: Misconduct10 min
  13. P2 17:07BUFPatrick Kaleta: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  14. P2 18:42BOSTyler Seguin: Hooking2 min
  15. P3 4:57BOSShawn Thornton: Tripping2 min
  16. P3 6:20BOSPatrice Bergeron: Tripping2 min
  17. P3 13:06BUFCraig Rivet: Tripping2 min
  18. P3 18:12BUFThomas Vanek: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaustad won the faceoff against Campbell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSBUF
26Shots on goal35
2.2Expected goals2.7
42Shot attempts63
18Faceoffs won45
4Power plays6
21Penalty minutes37
11Hits17
13Blocked shots8
5Giveaways12
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestHorton – Krejci – Lucic10:28

    xG 0.42–0.21 (66%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Ryder – Wheeler – Seguin8:20

    xG 0.21–0.12 (63%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  3. Thornton – Campbell – Marchand4:11

    xG 0.12–0.04 (76%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Recchi – Bergeron – Caron8:33

    xG 0.06–0.11 (36%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Ference12:38

    xG 0.23–0.08 (73%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Stuart – McQuaid8:58

    xG 0.25–0.21 (54%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

  3. Seidenberg – Hunwick12:34

    xG 0.21–0.35 (37%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHecht – Connolly – Pominville5:05

    xG 0.23–0.01 (95%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

  2. Roy – Vanek – Ennis2:04

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Niedermayer – Grier – Vanek3:20

    xG 0.12–0.09 (59%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  4. Roy – Stafford – Ennis4:17

    xG 0.02–0.02 (56%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLeopold – Myers2:03

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Morrisonn – Myers11:25

    xG 0.33–0.28 (54%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  3. Rivet – Sekera8:39

    xG 0.14–0.14 (51%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.7 xGBOS 2.2 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #442 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.64 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).