Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 10, 2010·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Boston Bruins 7, Pittsburgh Penguins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

PIT winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS21406513733
PIT218216012446

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:05PITArron AshamAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Matt Cooke · Wrist, 0.32 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:31BOSMark RecchiPPAssists: Tyler Seguin, Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:24BOSBrad MarchandUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P1 16:58PITBrooks OrpikAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:44PITChris KunitzAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:37PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 3:49BOSNathan HortonAssists: Dennis Seidenberg, Matt Hunwick · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P3 4:04BOSZdeno CharaAssists: Jordan Caron, Mark Recchi · Snap, 0.09 xG4–4
  9. P3 12:40BOSShawn ThorntonGWGAssists: Gregory Campbell, Adam McQuaid · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–4
  10. P3 16:13BOSBlake WheelerAssists: Mark Recchi, Michael Ryder · Backhand, 0.15 xG6–4
  11. P3 19:34BOSMilan LucicENAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Nathan Horton · Wrist, 0.65 xG7–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:33BOSShawn Thornton: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:33PITEric Godard: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 6:35BOSGregory Campbell: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 6:35PITMax Talbot: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 7:25PITKris Letang: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 14:15PITArron Asham: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 6:21BOSAdam McQuaid: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 6:21PITArron Asham: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 12:51PITBrooks Orpik: Interference2 min
  10. P2 18:31BOSJordan Caron: Hooking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 13:51BOSGregory Campbell: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← BOS attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Campbell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSPIT
33Shots on goal46
3.1Expected goals3.0
54Shot attempts74
37Faceoffs won34
3Power plays2
19Penalty minutes21
17Hits35
18Blocked shots15
2Giveaways8
7Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestHorton – Bergeron – Lucic13:37

    xG 0.81–0.71 (54%)attempts 15–20goals 1–1

  2. Recchi – Wheeler – Caron8:53

    xG 0.23–0.16 (59%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  3. Ryder – Paille – Seguin6:46

    xG 0.13–0.25 (34%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Campbell – Marchand10:38

    xG 0.23–1.13 (17%)attempts 12–15goals 2–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeidenberg – Hunwick4:13

    xG 0.28–0.02 (93%)attempts 6–4goals 2–0

  2. Seidenberg – Stuart8:33

    xG 0.35–0.22 (61%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  3. Chara – Seidenberg5:41

    xG 0.22–0.17 (57%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Crosby4:03

    xG 0.51–0.02 (97%)attempts 9–1goals 2–0

  2. Asham – Cooke – Malkin6:33

    xG 0.85–0.38 (69%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Rupp – Kennedy – Letestu6:55

    xG 0.25–0.11 (70%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  4. Adams – Godard – Talbot3:05

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Michalek16:53

    xG 1.37–0.53 (72%)attempts 25–11goals 1–0

  2. Orpik – Letang16:02

    xG 0.98–0.47 (68%)attempts 27–11goals 1–1

  3. Goligoski – Lovejoy10:19

    xG 0.17–0.34 (33%)attempts 7–13goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGBOS 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #39 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.25 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 7% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 52% of the time.

PIT winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).