Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 13, 2010·Philips Arena, Atlanta

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Atlanta Thrashers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 53% of the time.

ATL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT01017311428
ATL11207114233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:41ATLBrent SopelAssists: Alexander Burmistrov, Anthony Stewart · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P2 13:22PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Arron Asham, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:41PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Deryk Engelland, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:42PITEvgeni MalkinPPGWGAssists: Paul Martin, Sidney Crosby · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–1
  5. P3 10:45ATLNiclas BergforsAssists: Evander Kane, Alexander Burmistrov · Tip-in, 0.22 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:58PITEvgeni MalkinENAssists: Sidney Crosby, Matt Cooke · Tip-in, 0.69 xG4–2
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:21ATLChris Thorburn: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:21PITMike Rupp: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 3:51PITMatt Cooke: Interference2 min
  4. P1 11:59ATLEvander Kane: Interference2 min
  5. P1 12:48PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 16:02ATLRich Peverley: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 14:17PITPaul Martin: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 16:54ATLBryan Little: Holding2 min
  9. P2 19:57PITBrooks Orpik: Interference2 min
  10. P2 19:57ATLBen Eager: High sticking2 min
  11. P2 19:57PITMax Talbot: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 2:51ATLAlexander Burmistrov: Boarding2 min · PPG
  13. P3 5:00PITBrooks Orpik: Holding2 min
  14. P3 6:31ATLEvander Kane: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ATL
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackATL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Peverley
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITATL
28Shots on goal33
3.5Expected goals3.4
49Shot attempts55
21Faceoffs won31
5Power plays5
17Penalty minutes17
19Hits12
12Blocked shots13
7Giveaways14
7Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAsham – Cooke – Malkin4:46

    xG 0.32–0.16 (67%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Adams – Rupp – Talbot4:32

    xG 0.02–0.32 (5%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  3. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby8:36

    xG 0.21–0.57 (27%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  4. Kennedy – Conner – Letestu7:02

    xG 0.05–0.48 (10%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Orpik – Michalek2:02

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Letang2:15

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  3. Orpik – Letang10:47

    xG 0.47–0.76 (38%)attempts 9–11goals 1–1

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestLadd – Peverley – Bergfors8:38

    xG 1.01–0.52 (66%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  2. Stewart – Little – Kane3:45

    xG 0.48–0.12 (80%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

  3. Eager – Stewart – Little2:30

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Antropov – Thorburn – Eager2:12

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Byfuglien14:08

    xG 0.93–0.44 (68%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Sopel – Hainsey8:04

    xG 0.70–0.23 (75%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  3. Oduya – Bogosian13:06

    xG 0.89–0.50 (64%)attempts 14–10goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ATL 3.4 xGPIT 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ATLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ATL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ATL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #587 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.52 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50ATL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 53% of the time.

ATL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (ATL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).