Mon, Nov 15, 2010·TD Garden, Boston
New Jersey Devils 0, Boston Bruins 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 59% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJD | 07 | 07 | 014 | 028 |
| BOS | 110 | 17 | 17 | 324 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 15:26BOSMichael RyderPPGWGAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Mark Recchi · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
- P2 0:43BOSNathan HortonAssists: Milan Lucic, Zdeno Chara · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–2
- P3 0:43BOSBlake WheelerAssists: Mark Recchi, Jordan Caron · Snap, 0.05 xG0–3
Penalties (11)
- P1 3:05NJDAnton Volchenkov: Hooking2 min
- P1 3:05NJDRod Pelley: Fighting5 min
- P1 3:05BOSAdam McQuaid: Fighting5 min
- P1 13:47NJDMatthew Corrente: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P1 14:52NJDAdam Mair: Interference2 min
- P1 17:41BOSNathan Horton: Tripping2 min
- P2 1:06BOSZdeno Chara: Tripping2 min
- P2 4:59NJDMattias Tedenby: High sticking double minor4 min
- P2 15:41NJDJason Arnott: Boarding2 min
- P3 1:35BOSMichael Ryder: Tripping2 min
- P3 12:58NJDJason Arnott: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Wheeler won the faceoff against Arnott
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New Jersey Devils
Forward lines
- bestRolston – Zubrus – Clarkson8:16
xG 0.46–0.07 (87%)attempts 16–3goals 0–0
- Arnott – Elias – Tedenby7:18
xG 0.33–0.14 (70%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1
- Kovalchuk – Zajac – Vasyunov6:51
xG 0.07–0.17 (29%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1
- Mair – Pelley – Gionta4:44
xG 0.06–0.36 (14%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestVolchenkov – Greene9:46
xG 0.41–0.10 (81%)attempts 15–8goals 0–1
- White – Tallinder6:43
xG 0.33–0.10 (77%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1
- White – Magnan2:27
xG 0.22–0.07 (77%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestThornton – Campbell – Paille2:10
xG 0.54–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
- Thornton – Campbell – Marchand2:42
xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Thornton – Paille – Seguin5:00
xG 0.12–0.07 (64%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
- Ryder – Campbell – Marchand7:27
xG 0.07–0.16 (29%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFerence – McQuaid3:21
xG 0.26–0.06 (82%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0
- Chara – McQuaid2:58
xG 0.09–0.03 (74%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0
- Chara – Ference6:41
xG 0.13–0.09 (58%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 59% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − NJD), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).