Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 17, 2010·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Phoenix Coyotes 3, Calgary Flames 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHX0921517331
CGY01609115140

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 7:13PHXWojtek WolskiUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 12:33PHXMartin HanzalGWGAssists: Radim Vrbata, Adrian Aucoin · Wrist, 0.32 xG2–0
  3. P3 16:08CGYRene BourqueAssists: Brendan Morrison, Matt Stajan · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:52PHXLauri KorpikoskiENAssists: Martin Hanzal, Adrian Aucoin · Wrist, 0.58 xG3–1
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 0:42PHXDavid Schlemko: Interference2 min
  2. P1 8:19PHXKyle Turris: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 8:57CGYCurtis Glencross: Interference2 min
  4. P1 14:43CGYJarome Iginla: Holding2 min
  5. P2 7:55CGYMark Giordano: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 8:22CGYCurtis Glencross: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 8:22PHXDerek Morris: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 12:25CGYRobyn Regehr: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 13:51CGYCurtis Glencross: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 13:51PHXKeith Yandle: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 4:09CGYAlex Tanguay: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 10:32CGYOlli Jokinen: Cross checking5 min
  13. P3 10:32PHXWojtek Wolski: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 10:32CGYOlli Jokinen: Game misconduct10 min
  15. P3 10:32CGYNiklas Hagman: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 13:03PHXMartin Hanzal: Cross checking2 min
  17. P3 18:53PHXVernon Fiddler: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  18. P3 18:53CGYSteve Staios: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
47% to win53% to win
← PHX attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fiddler won the faceoff against Morrison
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXCGY
31Shots on goal40
2.5Expected goals3.1
51Shot attempts73
37Faceoffs won26
7Power plays2
17Penalty minutes36
7Hits17
18Blocked shots10
7Giveaways13
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestFiddler – Upshall – Korpikoski8:01

    xG 0.36–0.11 (77%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Pyatt – Bissonnette – Turris3:24

    xG 0.11–0.01 (90%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Belanger – Stempniak – Wolski9:39

    xG 0.24–0.58 (30%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  4. Whitney – Vrbata – Hanzal9:22

    xG 0.26–0.65 (29%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Yonkman – Schlemko3:27

    xG 0.12–0.23 (33%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Morris – Yandle16:31

    xG 0.39–0.59 (40%)attempts 16–21goals 0–0

  3. Aucoin – Jovanovski12:57

    xG 0.22–1.02 (18%)attempts 12–15goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Tanguay – Stajan7:16

    xG 0.45–0.15 (75%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Moss – Glencross – Backlund2:02

    xG 0.16–0.04 (80%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Jokinen – Bourque3:22

    xG 0.29–0.30 (50%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Jokinen – Glencross – Bourque3:32

    xG 0.07–0.09 (42%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Giordano3:28

    xG 0.53–0.04 (93%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  2. Staios – Giordano2:20

    xG 0.20–0.02 (91%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Staios – Mikkelson7:33

    xG 0.35–0.19 (65%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.1 xGPHX 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 17/100 · #981 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.84 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).