Fri, Nov 26, 2010·TD Garden, Boston
Carolina Hurricanes 3, Boston Bruins 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 70% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | 16 | 19 | 16 | 321 |
| BOS | 012 | 09 | 016 | 037 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 19:44CARJeff SkinnerPPGWGAssists: Tuomo Ruutu, Joe Corvo · Snap, 0.14 xG1–0
- P2 11:09CARTuomo RuutuPPAssists: Ian White, Joni Pitkanen · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–0
- P3 7:52CARJussi JokinenPPAssists: Eric Staal, Jeff Skinner · Snap, 0.08 xG3–0
Penalties (7)
- P1 18:51BOSBlake Wheeler: Holding2 min · PPG
- P2 7:01CARErik Cole: Interference2 min
- P2 9:11BOSAndrew Ference: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P2 15:41CARBrandon Sutter: Holding2 min
- P3 6:26BOSMilan Lucic: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
- P3 10:04CARJoni Pitkanen: High sticking2 min
- P3 12:00CARTim Gleason: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Bergeron
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestBodie – Tlusty – Carter6:15
xG 0.33–0.09 (79%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0
- Ruutu – LaRose – Skinner7:52
xG 0.09–0.05 (65%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
- Jokinen – Dwyer – Sutter10:31
xG 0.03–0.31 (8%)attempts 3–15goals 0–0
- Samsonov – Cole – Staal11:35
xG 0.14–0.88 (14%)attempts 7–16goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Pitkanen – White16:45
xG 0.37–0.37 (50%)attempts 14–19goals 0–0
- Harrison – McBain10:59
xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0
- Corvo – Gleason15:31
xG 0.30–0.85 (26%)attempts 12–17goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestHorton – Bergeron – Lucic13:11
xG 1.14–0.19 (86%)attempts 23–7goals 0–0
- Recchi – Campbell – Marchand6:08
xG 0.13–0.03 (80%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Recchi – Campbell – Paille3:17
xG 0.06–0.03 (67%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Thornton – Paille – Seguin5:17
xG 0.05–0.14 (26%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Ference11:59
xG 0.92–0.09 (91%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0
- Boychuk – Hunwick9:10
xG 0.16–0.09 (65%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0
- Seidenberg – Hunwick2:36
xG 0.08–0.02 (78%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 70% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − CAR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).