Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 26, 2010·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Nashville Predators 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH06014214234
MIN391717523

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:22MINMarek ZidlickyAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, Antti Miettinen · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:57MINAndrew BrunetteAssists: Patrick O'Sullivan, Mikko Koivu · Backhand, 0.28 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:12MINMartin HavlatGWGAssists: Marek Zidlicky · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–3
  4. P2 0:48MINNick SchultzAssists: Martin Havlat · Snap, 0.11 xG0–4
  5. P3 3:55NSHSteve SullivanPPAssists: Colin Wilson, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P3 14:02MINMartin HavlatAssists: Matt Cullen, Marek Zidlicky · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:51NSHMartin EratPPAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:54MINMarek Zidlicky: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 3:02NSHJordin Tootoo: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P2 12:06NSHShea Weber: Holding2 min
  4. P3 2:56MINGreg Zanon: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 9:43MINEric Nystrom: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 10:25MINMarek Zidlicky: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 12:53MINClayton Stoner: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 12:53NSHJordin Tootoo: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 18:40MINKyle Brodziak: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Smithson won the faceoff against Nystrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHMIN
34Shots on goal23
2.2Expected goals2.2
59Shot attempts40
29Faceoffs won24
5Power plays2
9Penalty minutes15
27Hits25
9Blocked shots8
5Giveaways5
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestDumont – Erat – Goc10:35

    xG 0.69–0.29 (71%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

  2. Smithson – Ward – Tootoo5:33

    xG 0.08–0.17 (34%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Smithson – Ward – Wilson3:47

    xG 0.07–0.15 (30%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Kostitsyn – Spaling – Wilson2:59

    xG 0.05–0.22 (18%)attempts 4–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSulzer – O'Brien7:27

    xG 0.12–0.02 (86%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Bouillon – Franson4:52

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. O'Brien – Franson2:34

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Havlat – Brodziak10:48

    xG 0.84–0.13 (87%)attempts 12–9goals 3–0

  2. Brunette – Koivu – O'Sullivan10:07

    xG 0.62–0.13 (82%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Madden – Miettinen – Clutterbuck9:37

    xG 0.29–0.16 (64%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  4. Nystrom – Earl – Staubitz7:48

    xG 0.12–0.06 (67%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Zidlicky11:48

    xG 0.32–0.17 (65%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – Burns16:35

    xG 0.70–0.64 (52%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  3. Zanon – Barker3:39

    xG 0.05–0.04 (57%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.2 xGNSH 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #907 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 52% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).