Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 27, 2010·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

Florida Panthers 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA0611124061427
TBL19114114000337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:21TBLTeddy PurcellPPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Ryan Malone · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:12TBLDana TyrellAssists: Mattias Ritola, Steve Downie · Backhand, 0.24 xG0–2
  3. P2 12:22FLARadek DvorakUnassisted · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–2
  4. P3 3:08FLADmitry KulikovUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:31FLAShawn MatthiasAssists: Mike Santorelli · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:15TBLSean BergenheimAssists: Teddy Purcell, Ryan Malone · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Chris Higgins stopped
  2. 2. TBL Teddy Purcell stopped
  3. 3. FLA Mike Santorelli stopped
  4. 4. TBL Steven Stamkos stopped
  5. 5. FLA David Booth stopped
  6. 6. TBL Sean Bergenheim stopped
  7. 7. FLA Stephen Weiss scored
  8. 8. TBL Martin St. Louis stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 1:13TBLMattias Ohlund: Elbowing2 min
  2. P1 4:38FLAStephen Weiss: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 8:27FLAMike Weaver: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:43TBLRyan Malone: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 2:15FLADennis Wideman: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 7:13TBLVictor Hedman: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P2 7:50FLAStephen Weiss: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 10:26FLADarcy Hordichuk: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 12:22TBLPavel Kubina: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  10. P2 17:11TBLDominic Moore: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 9:23FLAShawn Matthias: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 17:20FLABryan McCabe: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Moore won the faceoff against Reasoner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
27Shots on goal37
2.3Expected goals3.4
59Shot attempts73
40Faceoffs won30
4Power plays7
14Penalty minutes8
16Hits19
16Blocked shots20
4Giveaways14
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. Weiss – Booth – Frolik10:54

    xG 0.31–0.36 (46%)attempts 8–6goals 1–1

  2. Reinprecht – Booth – Repik3:04

    xG 0.02–0.13 (16%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Dvorak – Reasoner – Higgins8:04

    xG 0.03–0.21 (12%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Stillman – Santorelli – Matthias6:20

    xG 0.19–0.67 (22%)attempts 5–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Weaver – Garrison12:31

    xG 0.16–0.21 (42%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Wideman – Ellerby9:33

    xG 0.25–0.55 (32%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  3. McCabe – Wideman2:55

    xG 0.03–0.40 (8%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestMalone – Bergenheim – Purcell3:26

    xG 0.59–0.02 (96%)attempts 11–1goals 1–0

  2. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos9:18

    xG 0.32–0.09 (78%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. Hall – Thompson – Tyrell6:11

    xG 0.12–0.10 (54%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  4. Hall – Bergenheim – Thompson3:36

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClark – Hedman8:02

    xG 0.61–0.05 (92%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  2. Ohlund – Lundin11:50

    xG 0.45–0.27 (63%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

  3. Kubina – Jones9:08

    xG 0.47–0.37 (56%)attempts 17–8goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.4 xGFLA 2.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #67 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.51 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 67% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).