Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 3, 2010·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Calgary Flames 3, Minnesota Wild 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 75% of the time.

MIN winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY0101819052332
MIN0111614011222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 12:43MINPierre-Marc BouchardAssists: Nick Schultz, Martin Havlat · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 19:27CGYMark GiordanoAssists: Niklas Hagman, Olli Jokinen · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P3 4:39CGYAlex TanguayAssists: Matt Stajan, Jarome Iginla · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P3 12:39MINMartin HavlatAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Brent Burns · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  2. 2. CGY Alex Tanguay scored
  3. 3. MIN Pierre-Marc Bouchard stopped
  4. 4. CGY Niklas Hagman stopped
  5. 5. MIN Patrick O'Sullivan scored
  6. 6. CGY Rene Bourque scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:39CGYMark Giordano: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 12:25MINEric Nystrom: Interference2 min
  3. P1 15:37MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 16:47MINAntti Miettinen: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 18:58CGYAnton Babchuk: Interference2 min
  6. P2 4:26CGYDavid Moss: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 18:36MINKyle Brodziak: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 18:55CGYRene Bourque: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← CGY attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Stajan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYMIN
32Shots on goal22
2.7Expected goals1.4
50Shot attempts46
30Faceoffs won26
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
11Hits21
15Blocked shots6
2Giveaways2
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestMorrison – Moss – Glencross5:16

    xG 0.35–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Hagman – Backlund4:32

    xG 0.34–0.15 (69%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – Tanguay – Stajan12:23

    xG 0.34–0.27 (55%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  4. Morrison – Kostopoulos – Jackman2:43

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBabchuk – Giordano10:04

    xG 0.55–0.09 (86%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  2. Staios – Bouwmeester12:44

    xG 0.47–0.32 (59%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  3. Sarich – Regehr8:32

    xG 0.12–0.03 (79%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Cullen – O'Sullivan – Clutterbuck7:42

    xG 0.35–0.34 (51%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  2. Madden – Havlat – Nystrom2:20

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

  3. Havlat – Bouchard – Brodziak7:53

    xG 0.23–0.23 (50%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  4. Madden – Nystrom – Staubitz4:24

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Burns12:07

    xG 0.37–0.11 (78%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  2. Burns – Barker3:04

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Barker – Spurgeon8:51

    xG 0.17–0.25 (40%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.4 xGCGY 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #312 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.95 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 75% of the time.

MIN winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).