Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 4, 2010·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 7, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT41631306735
CBJ0211516223

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:43PITPaul MartinPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:59PITMike RuppAssists: Eric Godard, Craig Adams · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:55PITPaul MartinPPGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–0
  4. P1 15:49PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Mark Letestu, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–0
  5. P2 3:09PITTyler KennedyAssists: Mark Letestu, Chris Conner · Tip-in, 0.11 xG5–0
  6. P2 6:21CBJSamuel PahlssonAssists: Rostislav Klesla, Ethan Moreau · Deflected, 0.02 xG5–1
  7. P2 9:55PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Chris Kunitz, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.07 xG6–1
  8. P2 18:19PITDeryk EngellandUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG7–1
  9. P3 1:05CBJChris ClarkPPAssists: Fedor Tyutin, Ethan Moreau · Wrist, 0.05 xG7–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 5:25CBJChris Clark: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:25PITBrooks Orpik: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 11:53CBJMarc Methot: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 14:55CBJEthan Moreau: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:52PITMatt Cooke: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 16:52PITMatt Cooke: Holding2 min
  7. P2 8:39CBJJared Boll: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 8:39PITMike Rupp: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P2 10:43CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 10:43PITMike Rupp: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 19:36PITCraig Adams: Holding2 min · PPG
  12. P3 8:55PITDeryk Engelland: Elbowing2 min
  13. P3 13:02CBJMike Commodore: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Letestu won the faceoff against Brassard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
35Shots on goal23
2.2Expected goals0.9
55Shot attempts36
29Faceoffs won26
4Power plays5
17Penalty minutes15
19Hits23
8Blocked shots10
0Giveaways1
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Crosby10:38

    xG 0.44–0.14 (75%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  2. Kennedy – Conner – Letestu7:19

    xG 0.35–0.10 (77%)attempts 7–4goals 1–1

  3. Asham – Cooke – Talbot10:29

    xG 0.27–0.18 (60%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

  4. Adams – Rupp – Godard7:34

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Letang11:58

    xG 0.50–0.08 (86%)attempts 15–3goals 0–0

  2. Engelland – Goligoski15:31

    xG 0.61–0.30 (67%)attempts 14–14goals 3–0

  3. Martin – Michalek7:41

    xG 0.35–0.22 (61%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. MacKenzie – Boll – Dorsett5:44

    xG 0.13–0.15 (46%)attempts 3–6goals 0–2

  2. Moreau – Clark – Pahlsson8:02

    xG 0.17–0.27 (38%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  3. Vermette – Umberger – Filatov9:17

    xG 0.22–0.47 (32%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  4. Nash – Brassard – Voracek10:39

    xG 0.07–0.35 (17%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Klesla – Methot14:26

    xG 0.20–0.36 (36%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

  2. Tyutin – Hejda13:51

    xG 0.13–0.29 (31%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  3. Commodore – Russell11:47

    xG 0.22–0.70 (24%)attempts 7–15goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 0.9 xGPIT 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #906 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.61 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).