Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 4, 2010·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Minnesota Wild 3, Dallas Stars 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN071152900331
DAL171911314433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:42DALKarlis SkrastinsAssists: Steve Ott, Brandon Segal · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:45DALSteve OttPPAssists: James Neal, Kari Lehtonen · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P2 17:34MINAntti MiettinenAssists: Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:41MINChuck KobasewAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, Matt Cullen · Snap, 0.52 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:57DALAdam BurishAssists: Trevor Daley, Brandon Segal · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:51MINMartin HavlatAssists: Marek Zidlicky, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:37DALStephane RobidasPPGWGAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Brad Richards · Snap, 0.11 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:35MINNick Schultz: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:30DALSteve Ott: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 9:30MINMartin Havlat: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 11:37DALMatt Niskanen: Holding2 min
  5. P1 13:55MINAntti Miettinen: Hooking2 min
  6. P1 18:21DALBrandon Segal: Interference2 min
  7. P2 0:27MINAntti Miettinen: Interference2 min
  8. P2 6:25DALKarlis Skrastins: Delaying game2 min
  9. P2 7:02MINMartin Havlat: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P2 9:54MINMikko Koivu: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. OT 2:36MINBrent Burns: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richards won the faceoff against Madden
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDAL
31Shots on goal33
3.2Expected goals3.1
66Shot attempts66
31Faceoffs won30
3Power plays6
14Penalty minutes8
36Hits39
15Blocked shots18
10Giveaways19
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCullen – Kobasew – Clutterbuck7:52

    xG 1.07–0.17 (86%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Brunette – Miettinen – Koivu12:55

    xG 0.93–0.17 (85%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  3. Havlat – Bouchard – Brodziak10:46

    xG 0.46–0.09 (83%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

  4. Madden – Nystrom – Staubitz3:31

    xG 0.04–0.13 (26%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Zidlicky14:09

    xG 1.01–0.20 (83%)attempts 25–9goals 2–0

  2. Barker – Spurgeon10:01

    xG 0.91–0.33 (74%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  3. Schultz – Burns12:39

    xG 0.41–0.16 (72%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestSutherby – Eriksson – Wandell2:46

    xG 0.18–0.03 (88%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Ott – Segal – Burish7:54

    xG 0.29–0.37 (44%)attempts 7–13goals 2–1

  3. Richards – Eriksson – Neal11:49

    xG 0.22–0.60 (27%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1

  4. Morrow – Ribeiro – Benn10:57

    xG 0.25–1.07 (19%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWoywitka – Daley10:01

    xG 0.37–0.09 (80%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Robidas – Grossmann14:40

    xG 0.30–0.99 (23%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1

  3. Skrastins – Niskanen9:43

    xG 0.37–1.18 (24%)attempts 12–17goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 3.1 xGMIN 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #71 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.43 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).