Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 8, 2010·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

San Jose Sharks 5, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 55% of the time.

PHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS1609315032533
PHI0931419030435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:55SJSRyane CloweAssists: Niclas Wallin, Jason Demers · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:21PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Jeff Carter, Braydon Coburn · Wrist, 0.48 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:20PHIVille LeinoAssists: Scott Hartnell, Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:09PHINikolay ZherdevAssists: Matt Carle, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P3 6:15PHIScott HartnellAssists: Matt Carle, Ville Leino · Deflected, 0.21 xG1–4
  6. P3 7:33SJSJason DemersAssists: Dany Heatley · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 10:51SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Ryane Clowe, Justin Braun · Wrist, 0.45 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:28SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Joe Thornton · Snap, 0.09 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Daniel Brière stopped
  2. 2. SJS Logan Couture scored
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  4. 4. SJS Ryane Clowe scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 8:00SJSDouglas Murray: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 12:32PHIKimmo Timonen: Interference2 min
  3. P3 1:00SJSJason Demers: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 8:43PHIJeff Carter: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 11:26PHIDaniel Brière: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 12:50SJSJoe Pavelski: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 13:27PHIDaniel Brière: High sticking double minor4 min
  8. OT 3:06SJSDouglas Murray: Roughing2 min
  9. OT 3:06PHIKimmo Timonen: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← SJS attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brière won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSPHI
33Shots on goal35
3.4Expected goals3.2
68Shot attempts65
43Faceoffs won25
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes12
24Hits28
17Blocked shots21
3Giveaways5
9Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestClowe – Ferriero – Couture9:44

    xG 0.90–0.66 (58%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  2. Mayers – Nichol – McCarthy6:00

    xG 0.06–0.07 (46%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Heatley – Mitchell11:13

    xG 0.28–0.47 (37%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1

  4. Marleau – Pavelski – McGinn7:31

    xG 0.10–0.73 (12%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Vlasic – Demers11:23

    xG 0.55–0.62 (47%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Murray19:24

    xG 0.12–0.87 (12%)attempts 14–25goals 0–2

  3. Wallin – Braun8:24

    xG 0.21–1.06 (17%)attempts 6–12goals 0–2

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestZherdev – Carter – Giroux4:43

    xG 0.82–0.08 (91%)attempts 6–4goals 2–0

  2. Brière – Hartnell – Leino13:58

    xG 0.94–0.26 (78%)attempts 21–5goals 2–0

  3. Carter – Giroux – Powe4:54

    xG 0.61–0.17 (78%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  4. Richards – Nodl – van Riemsdyk11:52

    xG 0.44–0.22 (67%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Coburn13:05

    xG 1.32–0.11 (92%)attempts 19–9goals 2–0

  2. Pronger – Carle12:56

    xG 0.75–0.19 (80%)attempts 12–10goals 2–1

  3. O'Donnell – Meszaros14:30

    xG 0.78–0.43 (65%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.2 xGSJS 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #34 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.29 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 55% of the time.

PHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).