Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 15, 2010·United Center, Chicago

Colorado Avalanche 4, Chicago Blackhawks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL1606311423
CHI01411628338

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:39COLGreg MauldinAssists: Daniel Winnik, Adam Foote · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:14CHIBryan BickellAssists: Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P3 4:30COLTomas FleischmannPPAssists: Paul Stastny, Matt Duchene · Tip-in, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P3 6:24COLTomas FleischmannPPAssists: Matt Duchene, Kevin Shattenkirk · Backhand, 0.20 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:37CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Jassen Cullimore, Tomas Kopecky · Wrist, 0.55 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:42COLTomas FleischmannGWGAssists: David Jones, Ryan O'Byrne · Wrist, 0.24 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:58CHITroy BrouwerAssists: Bryan Bickell, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:40COLBrandon Yip: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 6:30COLPhilippe Dupuis: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 5:37CHIJake Dowell: Holding2 min
  4. P2 5:37COLDavid Jones: Interference2 min
  5. P2 13:02COLRyan O'Byrne: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 16:44CHIBryan Bickell: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 2:40CHIJordan Hendry: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Duchene won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLCHI
23Shots on goal38
3.5Expected goals2.7
38Shot attempts71
28Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
26Hits32
24Blocked shots9
3Giveaways3
6Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestYip – Winnik – O'Reilly3:22

    xG 0.38–0.07 (84%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Mauldin – Winnik – O'Reilly8:26

    xG 0.51–0.28 (65%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

  3. Fleischmann – Jones – Duchene9:37

    xG 0.53–0.34 (60%)attempts 7–13goals 1–1

  4. Porter – Yip – Stastny7:29

    xG 0.07–0.09 (43%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Byrne – Wilson2:43

    xG 0.21–0.01 (94%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Wilson – Shattenkirk10:55

    xG 0.45–0.30 (60%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  3. Foote – O'Byrne2:20

    xG 0.14–0.10 (59%)attempts 1–4goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSharp – Skille – Toews3:11

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Skille – Stalberg – Toews6:47

    xG 0.39–0.17 (70%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Kopecky – Sharp – Morin3:43

    xG 0.08–0.36 (18%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  4. Bolland – Bickell – Brouwer9:29

    xG 0.10–0.48 (17%)attempts 7–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCullimore – Boynton4:43

    xG 0.75–0.40 (65%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  2. Campbell – Hjalmarsson11:12

    xG 0.46–0.20 (69%)attempts 15–4goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook13:50

    xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.7 xGCOL 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHICOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #509 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.48 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).