Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 16, 2010·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Edmonton Oilers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 55% of the time.

EDM winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ22306111340
EDM31331409636

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:58EDMLinus OmarkAssists: Ryan Whitney · Wrist, 0.36 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:32CBJKristian HuseliusAssists: Rostislav Klesla, R.J. Umberger · Backhand, 0.22 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:25EDMJordan EberleAssists: Taylor Hall, Sam Gagner · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:19CBJKristian HuseliusPPAssists: R.J. Umberger, Rick Nash · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P1 19:29EDMDustin PennerPPAssists: Linus Omark, Magnus Paajarvi · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P2 3:32EDMJordan EberleGWGAssists: Ryan Whitney, Taylor Hall · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P2 14:23EDMMagnus PaajarviAssists: Ryan O'Marra, Linus Omark · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–5
  8. P2 15:12EDMSam GagnerAssists: Taylor Hall · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–6
  9. P3 18:53CBJKristian HuseliusAssists: Antoine Vermette · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:16EDMZack Stortini: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 6:16CBJTom Sestito: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:56EDMAndrew Cogliano: Holding2 min
  4. P1 15:25EDMJason Strudwick: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 18:20CBJDerick Brassard: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 10:09CBJMike Commodore: Interference2 min
  7. P2 14:59CBJJakub Voracek: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:59EDMTheo Peckham: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 2:07EDMRyan O'Marra: Boarding2 min
  10. P3 8:40CBJRostislav Klesla: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 13:29CBJKristian Huselius: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pahlsson won the faceoff against O'Marra
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJEDM
40Shots on goal36
3.6Expected goals3.3
77Shot attempts60
32Faceoffs won28
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
32Hits18
13Blocked shots22
13Giveaways16
9Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHuselius – Vermette – Umberger8:12

    xG 0.91–0.37 (71%)attempts 20–5goals 2–2

  2. Nash – Brassard – Voracek12:04

    xG 1.07–0.54 (66%)attempts 20–9goals 0–1

  3. Murray – Boll – Sestito6:34

    xG 0.15–0.18 (46%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  4. Moreau – Clark – Pahlsson9:48

    xG 0.42–0.79 (35%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCommodore – Russell10:29

    xG 0.52–0.08 (87%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Klesla – Methot10:46

    xG 0.67–0.49 (58%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

  3. Tyutin – Hejda11:14

    xG 0.67–0.72 (48%)attempts 21–8goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Marra – Omark – Paajarvi8:28

    xG 0.74–0.45 (62%)attempts 9–8goals 2–0

  2. Gagner – Eberle – Hall13:03

    xG 0.85–0.82 (51%)attempts 13–18goals 2–0

  3. Penner – Brule – Cogliano10:56

    xG 0.32–0.52 (39%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

  4. Fraser – Stortini – Jones5:00

    xG 0.18–0.40 (31%)attempts 6–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestStrudwick – Whitney12:22

    xG 1.13–0.76 (60%)attempts 14–16goals 3–0

  2. Foster – Smid12:16

    xG 0.55–0.78 (41%)attempts 14–22goals 0–1

  3. Gilbert – Peckham14:24

    xG 0.32–0.81 (28%)attempts 12–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.3 xGCBJ 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #397 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 55% of the time.

EDM winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).