Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 17, 2010·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Buffalo Sabres 2, Florida Panthers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 55% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF014112117243
FLA4101719626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:40FLABryan McCabeAssists: Shawn Matthias, Evgenii Dadonov · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:23FLAMarty ReasonerAssists: Evgenii Dadonov, Dennis Wideman · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:08FLAMarty ReasonerGWGAssists: Jason Garrison · Snap, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P1 16:28FLADavid BoothPPAssists: Michael Frolik, Shawn Matthias · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–4
  5. P2 18:58FLAMichael FrolikAssists: Stephen Weiss, Chris Higgins · Snap, 0.09 xG0–5
  6. P2 19:41BUFDerek RoyAssists: Tyler Myers, Patrick Lalime · Slap, 0.02 xG1–5
  7. P3 0:13FLAStephen WeissSHAssists: Chris Higgins · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–6
  8. P3 1:41BUFTim ConnollyPPAssists: Jochen Hecht, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:37FLABryan Allen: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:00FLADarcy Hordichuk: Holding2 min
  3. P1 15:20BUFPaul Gaustad: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:28BUFJordan Leopold: Holding2 min
  5. P1 0:00BUFRob Niedermayer: Interference2 min
  6. P2 4:43BUFRob Niedermayer: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 15:18FLADennis Wideman: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 15:18BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 19:52FLAMarty Reasoner: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 3:20BUFPatrick Kaleta: Charging2 min
  11. P3 3:20FLAMarty Reasoner: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 3:20BUFPatrick Kaleta: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 9:00FLADarcy Hordichuk: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 13:39FLABryan Allen: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Santorelli won the faceoff against Connolly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFFLA
43Shots on goal26
3.4Expected goals3.2
72Shot attempts50
29Faceoffs won24
5Power plays5
14Penalty minutes14
31Hits30
9Blocked shots15
4Giveaways3
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Connolly – Kaleta – Ennis5:58

    xG 0.12–0.14 (46%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

  2. Grier – Gaustad – McCormick5:10

    xG 0.25–0.38 (40%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Niedermayer – Hecht – Pominville5:20

    xG 0.13–0.38 (25%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  4. Roy – Vanek – Stafford9:06

    xG 0.37–1.00 (27%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSekera – Myers11:07

    xG 0.53–0.41 (56%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  2. Montador – Butler4:44

    xG 0.14–0.16 (46%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Leopold – Montador7:38

    xG 0.19–0.30 (39%)attempts 8–5goals 0–3

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestReasoner – Matthias – Dadonov7:13

    xG 0.83–0.11 (88%)attempts 8–6goals 3–0

  2. Weiss – Higgins – Frolik6:52

    xG 0.75–0.56 (57%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  3. Reinprecht – Booth – Thomas4:47

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Hordichuk – Bernier – Santorelli2:29

    xG 0.01–0.01 (56%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeaver – Garrison9:30

    xG 1.10–0.19 (85%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1

  2. Allen – Weaver2:12

    xG 0.13–0.09 (59%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. McCabe – Kulikov9:16

    xG 0.30–0.27 (52%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.2 xGBUF 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #912 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.55 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 55% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).