Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 18, 2010·Philips Arena, Atlanta

New Jersey Devils 1, Atlanta Thrashers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Atlanta Thrashers win this game 56% of the time.

ATL winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NJD04111012127
ATL3111734722

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:56ATLRon HainseyAssists: Brent Sopel, Nik Antropov · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:30ATLEric BoultonGWGAssists: Chris Thorburn, Johnny Oduya · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 16:08ATLEvander KaneAssists: Anthony Stewart, Ron Hainsey · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 6:37ATLAndrew LaddAssists: Rich Peverley, Toby Enstrom · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–4
  5. P2 15:43NJDIlya KovalchukPPAssists: Travis Zajac, Patrik Elias · Slap, 0.03 xG1–4
  6. P3 4:07ATLEric BoultonAssists: Chris Thorburn, Jim Slater · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–5
  7. P3 16:54ATLEric BoultonUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–6
  8. P3 18:58ATLChris ThorburnAssists: Evander Kane, Anthony Stewart · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–7
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:44NJDAdam Mair: Holding2 min
  2. P2 1:45ATLChris Thorburn: Holding2 min
  3. P2 7:35NJDAdam Mair: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 7:35ATLJohnny Oduya: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 9:35NJDBrian Rolston: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 14:38ATLNik Antropov: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 15:25NJDTravis Zajac: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 15:25ATLRich Peverley: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 19:20ATLRon Hainsey: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ATL
47% to win53% to win
← NJD attackATL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Peverley won the faceoff against Arnott
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDATL
27Shots on goal22
1.5Expected goals1.8
53Shot attempts40
31Faceoffs won28
3Power plays2
11Penalty minutes13
21Hits12
12Blocked shots16
4Giveaways6
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestMair – Sestito – Pelley7:22

    xG 0.29–0.22 (57%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  2. Langenbrunner – Elias – Zajac8:54

    xG 0.30–0.27 (53%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  3. Arnott – Zubrus – Kovalchuk6:23

    xG 0.08–0.14 (38%)attempts 3–6goals 0–2

  4. Rolston – Clarkson – Tedenby5:13

    xG 0.03–0.13 (20%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWhite – Tallinder6:03

    xG 0.22–0.05 (82%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Fayne – Greene13:26

    xG 0.55–0.50 (52%)attempts 16–9goals 0–3

  3. Tallinder – Volchenkov9:17

    xG 0.29–0.28 (51%)attempts 9–3goals 0–2

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestBoulton – Thorburn – Slater8:36

    xG 0.59–0.14 (81%)attempts 7–8goals 3–0

  2. Modin – Stapleton – Burmistrov8:53

    xG 0.08–0.11 (41%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Antropov – Ladd – Peverley12:35

    xG 0.16–0.21 (43%)attempts 7–9goals 2–0

  4. Stewart – Little – Kane10:51

    xG 0.29–0.40 (42%)attempts 6–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSopel – Hainsey13:22

    xG 0.69–0.09 (88%)attempts 7–8goals 4–0

  2. Enstrom – Byfuglien18:43

    xG 0.47–0.28 (63%)attempts 13–13goals 2–0

  3. Hainsey – Bogosian2:14

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ATL 1.8 xGNJD 1.5 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ATLNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ATL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ATL is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1021 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50ATL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Atlanta Thrashers win this game 56% of the time.

ATL winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (ATL − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).