Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 20, 2010·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Phoenix Coyotes 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

PIT winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHX0160516127
PIT21431519638

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:56PITKris LetangPPAssists: Tyler Kennedy, Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:25PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:51PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:50PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.09 xG0–4
  5. P2 7:21PITMatt CookeAssists: Max Talbot, Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.09 xG0–5
  6. P3 8:07PHXWojtek WolskiAssists: Derek Morris, Eric Belanger · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–5
  7. P3 18:21PITChris ConnerAssists: Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–6
Penalties (22)
  1. P1 5:54PHXNolan Yonkman: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:45PITMarc-Andre Fleury: Delaying game2 min
  3. P1 10:15PITChris Kunitz: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 15:33PITKris Letang: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P1 18:40PITAlex Goligoski: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 19:23PHXShane Doan: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 1:54PHXWojtek Wolski: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P2 13:25PITMike Rupp: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 13:57PITMatt Cooke: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 14:38PITBrooks Orpik: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 1:39PITDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 1:39PHXVernon Fiddler: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 1:39PHXVernon Fiddler: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 1:39PHXTaylor Pyatt: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 1:39PITMatt Cooke: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 5:25PHXScottie Upshall: Misconduct10 min
  17. P3 5:25PHXScottie Upshall: Slashing2 min
  18. P3 19:35PITCraig Adams: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 19:35PITCraig Adams: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  20. P3 19:35PITCraig Adams: Roughing2 min
  21. P3 19:35PHXNolan Yonkman: Roughing2 min
  22. P3 19:35PHXNolan Yonkman: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← PHX attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Hanzal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXPIT
27Shots on goal38
2.2Expected goals3.0
58Shot attempts65
32Faceoffs won25
8Power plays5
39Penalty minutes35
22Hits18
15Blocked shots13
6Giveaways3
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestDoan – Belanger – Wolski9:22

    xG 0.43–0.19 (70%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

  2. Fiddler – Stempniak – Turris4:03

    xG 0.12–0.03 (81%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Upshall – Stempniak – Turris4:39

    xG 0.22–0.15 (60%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  4. Pyatt – Fiddler – Korpikoski2:19

    xG 0.07–0.04 (62%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAucoin – Ekman-Larsson7:40

    xG 0.23–0.15 (61%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Yonkman – Ekman-Larsson4:21

    xG 0.17–0.23 (43%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Aucoin – Jovanovski4:31

    xG 0.04–0.12 (23%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Talbot – Malkin3:56

    xG 0.26–0.02 (93%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Kennedy – Conner – Letestu8:31

    xG 0.36–0.15 (71%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Adams – Dupuis – Talbot2:02

    xG 0.11–0.07 (62%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Asham – Adams – Rupp4:58

    xG 0.07–0.08 (50%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Goligoski12:08

    xG 0.58–0.26 (69%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0

  2. Orpik – Letang11:51

    xG 0.55–0.28 (66%)attempts 10–7goals 1–1

  3. Martin – Michalek9:50

    xG 0.29–0.42 (41%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGPHX 2.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1009 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.62 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 63% of the time.

PIT winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).