Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 23, 2010·TD Garden, Boston

Atlanta Thrashers 1, Boston Bruins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 80% of the time.

BOS winsATL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ATL0101809127
BOS110213113436

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:00BOSPatrice BergeronSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:04BOSMichael RyderPPGWGAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Dennis Seidenberg · Snap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:00BOSShawn ThorntonAssists: Adam McQuaid, Daniel Paille · Slap, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 8:40ATLDustin ByfuglienAssists: Evander Kane, Bryan Little · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:54BOSShawn ThorntonAssists: Daniel Paille, Gregory Campbell · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–4
Penalties (24)
  1. P1 0:02BOSShawn Thornton: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 0:02ATLEric Boulton: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 2:46BOSZdeno Chara: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 4:57ATLAndrew Ladd: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P1 5:52BOSMilan Lucic: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 9:48ATLRon Hainsey: Hooking2 min
  7. P1 16:51ATLJohnny Oduya: Holding2 min
  8. P2 3:13ATLAndrew Ladd: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 15:54ATLEvander Kane: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 15:54ATLFreddy Meyer: Elbowing2 min
  11. P3 15:54ATLFreddy Meyer: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 15:54ATLBryan Little: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 15:54ATLBryan Little: Game misconduct10 min
  14. P3 15:54ATLAnthony Stewart: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 15:54ATLAnthony Stewart: Game misconduct10 min
  16. P3 15:54BOSMilan Lucic: Game misconduct10 min
  17. P3 15:54BOSMilan Lucic: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min
  18. P3 15:54BOSNathan Horton: Fighting5 min
  19. P3 15:54BOSMarc Savard: Fighting5 min
  20. P3 15:54BOSMarc Savard: Game misconduct10 min
  21. P3 15:54BOSAndrew Ference: Roughing2 min
  22. P3 15:54BOSAndrew Ference: Fighting5 min
  23. P3 15:54BOSAndrew Ference: Game misconduct10 min
  24. P3 16:59ATLTim Stapleton: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ATL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
47% to win53% to win
← ATL attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Campbell won the faceoff against Slater
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ATLBOS
27Shots on goal36
1.3Expected goals3.0
52Shot attempts71
25Faceoffs won38
3Power plays5
54Penalty minutes66
27Hits15
19Blocked shots14
4Giveaways2
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. Ladd – Peverley – Stapleton10:46

    xG 0.57–0.55 (51%)attempts 14–16goals 0–0

  2. Stewart – Little – Kane12:17

    xG 0.30–0.36 (46%)attempts 17–13goals 1–0

  3. Modin – Eager – Burmistrov8:14

    xG 0.30–0.42 (41%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  4. Boulton – Thorburn – Slater8:19

    xG 0.03–0.31 (10%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Oduya – Meyer11:05

    xG 0.20–0.17 (55%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  2. Sopel – Hainsey12:16

    xG 0.27–0.25 (51%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Oduya – Byfuglien3:06

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Campbell – Paille8:54

    xG 0.39–0.10 (80%)attempts 7–5goals 2–0

  2. Ryder – Wheeler – Krejci10:57

    xG 0.36–0.18 (66%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

  3. Recchi – Bergeron – Seguin10:35

    xG 0.35–0.29 (54%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  4. Savard – Horton – Lucic10:21

    xG 0.56–0.52 (52%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeidenberg – Kampfer13:06

    xG 0.67–0.21 (76%)attempts 16–16goals 1–1

  2. Ference – McQuaid13:24

    xG 0.36–0.15 (71%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Chara – Boychuk16:11

    xG 0.55–0.89 (38%)attempts 22–21goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.0 xGATL 1.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSATL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it ATL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #872 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.75 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
ATL 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 80% of the time.

BOS winsATL wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − ATL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).