Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 23, 2010·Verizon Center, Washington

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Washington Capitals 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 77% of the time.

WSH winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT1606111042327
WSH01211315041234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:21PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Kris Letang, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:43WSHMike GreenPPAssists: Alexander Semin, Nicklas Backstrom · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:17PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Paul Martin · Wrist, 0.28 xG2–1
  4. P3 14:31WSHMike KnubleSHAssists: Brooks Laich · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. WSH Alex Ovechkin scored
  2. 2. PIT Kris Letang scored
  3. 3. WSH Alexander Semin stopped
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. WSH Nicklas Backstrom stopped
  6. 6. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
  7. 7. WSH Mike Knuble stopped
  8. 8. PIT Mark Letestu stopped
  9. 9. WSH Brooks Laich stopped
  10. 10. PIT Chris Kunitz stopped
  11. 11. WSH Mathieu Perreault stopped
  12. 12. PIT Tyler Kennedy stopped
  13. 13. WSH Mike Green stopped
  14. 14. PIT Pascal Dupuis scored
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 0:49PITMatt Cooke: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 0:49WSHJohn Erskine: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 1:10PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference2 min
  4. P1 7:20PITChris Conner: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P1 7:59PITZbynek Michalek: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P1 8:47WSHBrooks Laich: Interference2 min
  7. P2 1:23WSHMike Green: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  8. P2 4:59PITAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 11:42PITMike Rupp: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 11:51PITMatt Cooke: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  11. P2 17:01WSHAlex Ovechkin: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 0:47WSHMathieu Perreault: Holding2 min
  13. P3 9:21WSHNicklas Backstrom: High sticking2 min
  14. P3 13:25WSHMathieu Perreault: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITWSH
27Shots on goal34
1.5Expected goals3.0
56Shot attempts69
37Faceoffs won34
5Power plays6
14Penalty minutes12
33Hits35
23Blocked shots21
11Giveaways14
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Crosby3:23

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Cooke – Talbot – Malkin6:43

    xG 0.14–0.12 (53%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Cooke – Dupuis – Talbot2:54

    xG 0.03–0.05 (38%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby7:30

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Michalek11:23

    xG 0.51–0.06 (90%)attempts 14–2goals 1–0

  2. Michalek – Goligoski2:18

    xG 0.06–0.02 (79%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Goligoski – Letang2:10

    xG 0.04–0.08 (32%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestFehr – Ovechkin – Perreault3:48

    xG 0.40–0.03 (93%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Knuble – Laich – Backstrom9:26

    xG 0.58–0.39 (60%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  3. Semin – Ovechkin – Backstrom2:19

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Semin – Ovechkin – Perreault5:12

    xG 0.11–0.05 (67%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Green13:21

    xG 0.74–0.12 (86%)attempts 23–10goals 0–0

  2. Erskine – Carlson2:44

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Hannan – Alzner3:05

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 3.0 xGPIT 1.5 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #287 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.01 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 77% of the time.

WSH winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).