Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 26, 2010·United Center, Chicago

Columbus Blue Jackets 1, Chicago Blackhawks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 51% of the time.

CHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ0140716127
CHI180938425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:00CHITomas KopeckyAssists: Marian Hossa, Jassen Cullimore · Wrist, 0.30 xG0–1
  2. P3 1:22CHIPatrick SharpPPGWGAssists: Brent Seabrook, Marian Hossa · Slap, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P3 11:10CHIDave BollandPPAssists: Troy Brouwer, Bryan Bickell · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P3 11:47CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Troy Brouwer, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–4
  5. P3 17:34CBJDerick BrassardPPAssists: Tom Sestito, Fedor Tyutin · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:11CBJRostislav Klesla: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 13:04CHINick Boynton: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 17:51CBJEthan Moreau: Interference2 min
  4. P2 0:19CHIBrent Seabrook: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:48CBJMarc Methot: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:44CBJRostislav Klesla: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  7. P3 1:16CBJMarc Methot: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 3:19CHIBrent Seabrook: Boarding2 min
  9. P3 9:12CBJAntoine Vermette: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  10. P3 14:31CBJDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 14:31CHIJake Dowell: Fighting5 min · PPG
  12. P3 15:56CHIDave Bolland: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Bolland
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJCHI
27Shots on goal25
2.8Expected goals2.7
53Shot attempts46
28Faceoffs won26
4Power plays5
15Penalty minutes13
23Hits16
17Blocked shots15
4Giveaways8
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Nash – Voracek12:36

    xG 0.88–0.14 (86%)attempts 17–8goals 0–0

  2. Huselius – Umberger – Wilson8:38

    xG 0.38–0.29 (56%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Moreau – Pahlsson – Boll7:54

    xG 0.22–0.14 (61%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Dorsett – Sestito – Brassard4:10

    xG 0.06–0.36 (15%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Methot12:28

    xG 0.87–0.58 (60%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1

  2. Hejda – Russell14:55

    xG 0.46–0.21 (69%)attempts 14–5goals 0–1

  3. Klesla – Stralman11:43

    xG 0.23–0.86 (21%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Kopecky – Stalberg9:26

    xG 0.63–0.27 (70%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  2. Dowell – Skille – Scott4:30

    xG 0.15–0.08 (65%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Sharp – Brouwer – Toews10:06

    xG 0.29–0.41 (41%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Pisani – Bolland – Bickell12:06

    xG 0.20–0.62 (25%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook13:53

    xG 0.80–0.34 (70%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  2. Cullimore – Boynton12:11

    xG 0.53–0.23 (70%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  3. Campbell – Keith2:19

    xG 0.19–0.03 (86%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.7 xGCBJ 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1005 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 51% of the time.

CHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).