Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 29, 2010·Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum, Uniondale

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, New York Islanders 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 70% of the time.

NYI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT01211209052138
NYI0101708013226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:34NYIJosh BaileyAssists: Travis Hamonic · Wrist, 0.42 xG0–1
  2. P2 16:33PITChris ConnerAssists: Tyler Kennedy · Snap, 0.20 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. NYI Rob Schremp scored
  2. 2. PIT Kris Letang scored
  3. 3. NYI Frans Nielsen scored
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. NYI John Tavares stopped
  6. 6. PIT Evgeni Malkin scored
  7. 7. NYI PA Parenteau scored
  8. 8. PIT Mark Letestu stopped
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 9:07NYIZenon Konopka: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 9:07PITCraig Adams: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 16:22PITChris Kunitz: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 16:22NYIPA Parenteau: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 3:12PITPascal Dupuis: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 10:50NYIJon Sim: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 10:50PITBrooks Orpik: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 14:01NYIMatt Martin: Boarding2 min
  9. P3 0:14PITZbynek Michalek: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 3:22PITKris Letang: Interference2 min
  11. OT 3:46NYIJosh Bailey: Too many men on the ice2 min
  12. OT 4:49NYIFrans Nielsen: Roughing2 min
  13. OT 4:49PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  14. OT 5:00NYIZenon Konopka: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYI
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackNYI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Nielsen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNYI
38Shots on goal26
3.9Expected goals2.7
84Shot attempts42
32Faceoffs won35
2Power plays3
17Penalty minutes25
29Hits31
6Blocked shots28
13Giveaways10
12Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAsham – Adams – Rupp4:15

    xG 0.30–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Cooke – Dupuis – Talbot2:42

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Malkin – Crosby5:31

    xG 0.23–0.18 (56%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Talbot – Malkin4:55

    xG 0.14–0.12 (54%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Letang12:20

    xG 0.61–0.34 (64%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Engelland – Goligoski12:54

    xG 0.33–0.45 (43%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  3. Martin – Michalek13:16

    xG 0.76–1.05 (42%)attempts 19–11goals 0–1

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. bestNielsen – Grabner – Bailey11:33

    xG 1.31–0.29 (82%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. Parenteau – Moulson – Tavares11:35

    xG 0.45–0.34 (57%)attempts 10–14goals 0–0

  3. Gillies – Konopka – Martin3:41

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

  4. Sim – Schremp – Comeau7:53

    xG 0.14–0.74 (16%)attempts 1–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEaton – Jurcina15:13

    xG 0.54–0.25 (68%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. MacDonald – Hamonic15:59

    xG 0.92–0.70 (57%)attempts 11–21goals 1–1

  3. Gervais – Hillen11:06

    xG 0.43–0.79 (36%)attempts 5–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYI 2.7 xGPIT 3.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 37/100 · #751 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NYI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 70% of the time.

NYI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NYI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).