Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 31, 2010·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Vancouver Canucks 4, Dallas Stars 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 89% of the time.

DAL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN282707422
DAL08018119145

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:11VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:58VANRaffi TorresGWGAssists: Jannik Hansen, Kevin Bieksa · Backhand, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:52VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Daniel Sedin · Snap, 0.07 xG3–0
  4. P2 16:50VANKevin BieksaPPAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Manny Malhotra · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–0
  5. P3 3:21DALBrenden MorrowPPAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Loui Eriksson · Wrist, 0.28 xG4–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 16:31DALStephane Robidas: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:31VANChristian Ehrhoff: Interference2 min
  3. P2 9:40DALMike Ribeiro: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 10:24DALAdam Burish: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 13:02VANAlexandre Burrows: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 15:07DALBrandon Segal: Abuse of officials2 min · PPG
  7. P3 1:39VANRyan Kesler: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 6:58VANChristian Ehrhoff: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 15:44DALStephane Robidas: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 18:53VANAlexandre Bolduc: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 18:53VANTanner Glass: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 18:53DALSteve Ott: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 18:53DALJeff Woywitka: Holding2 min
  14. P3 18:53DALJeff Woywitka: Elbowing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Burish won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANDAL
22Shots on goal45
1.5Expected goals4.3
41Shot attempts80
23Faceoffs won35
6Power plays4
20Penalty minutes24
31Hits24
18Blocked shots12
16Giveaways11
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestKesler – Tambellini – Hansen8:51

    xG 0.23–0.17 (58%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  2. Samuelsson – Sedin – Sedin2:40

    xG 0.03–0.12 (19%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Bolduc – Glass – Volpatti5:13

    xG 0.03–0.15 (18%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows7:23

    xG 0.03–0.66 (5%)attempts 3–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hamhuis – Bieksa15:58

    xG 0.60–0.65 (48%)attempts 16–20goals 1–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Edler13:38

    xG 0.06–0.62 (8%)attempts 7–16goals 0–0

  3. Alberts – Ballard12:28

    xG 0.06–0.87 (7%)attempts 5–22goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRichards – Eriksson – Neal12:45

    xG 0.89–0.04 (95%)attempts 23–4goals 0–0

  2. Morrow – Ribeiro – Benn9:59

    xG 0.83–0.02 (97%)attempts 20–3goals 0–0

  3. Petersen – Segal – Wandell4:26

    xG 0.13–0.07 (65%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Ott – Burish – Wandell2:33

    xG 0.14–0.09 (61%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWoywitka – Daley15:06

    xG 0.96–0.12 (89%)attempts 26–6goals 0–0

  2. Robidas – Grossmann14:16

    xG 0.43–0.13 (76%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  3. Skrastins – Fistric10:13

    xG 0.22–0.34 (40%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 4.3 xGVAN 1.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1027 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 89% of the time.

DAL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).