Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 2, 2011·Centre Bell, Montreal

Atlanta Thrashers 4, Montréal Canadiens 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 82% of the time.

MTL winsATL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ATL152140415428
MTL11611711601350

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:20ATLRich PeverleyAssists: Toby Enstrom, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:56MTLTomas PlekanecPPAssists: James Wisniewski, Yannick Weber · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:42ATLEvander KaneAssists: Patrice Cormier, Chris Thorburn · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:25MTLP.K. SubbanPPAssists: Roman Hamrlik, Scott Gomez · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:44ATLAndrew LaddAssists: Toby Enstrom, Niclas Bergfors · Wrist, 0.39 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:13MTLBrian GiontaAssists: Max Pacioretty, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:43ATLDustin ByfuglienPPGWGAssists: Toby Enstrom, Evander Kane · Slap, 0.03 xG4–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 1:55MTLScott Gomez: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 17:36ATLBrent Sopel: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:42ATLNik Antropov: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 9:00ATLRon Hainsey: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. OT 1:51MTLP.K. Subban: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ATL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← ATL attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Little won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ATLMTL
28Shots on goal50
3.3Expected goals5.9
52Shot attempts91
25Faceoffs won43
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
16Hits23
20Blocked shots13
10Giveaways8
2Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Atlanta Thrashers

Forward lines

  1. bestModin – Stewart – Peverley11:34

    xG 0.93–0.58 (61%)attempts 14–11goals 1–0

  2. Antropov – Ladd – Little5:48

    xG 0.08–0.09 (49%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Thorburn – Cormier – Kane6:27

    xG 0.96–1.11 (46%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  4. Boulton – Antropov – Burmistrov6:14

    xG 0.01–0.19 (4%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Enstrom – Bogosian2:43

    xG 0.10–0.10 (51%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Enstrom – Byfuglien18:40

    xG 0.98–1.41 (41%)attempts 17–22goals 2–0

  3. Oduya – Bogosian17:01

    xG 1.33–2.33 (36%)attempts 16–22goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestGomez – Gionta – Pacioretty14:57

    xG 3.02–0.73 (81%)attempts 33–10goals 1–0

  2. Darche – Pouliot – Desharnais12:11

    xG 0.80–0.50 (61%)attempts 18–8goals 0–1

  3. Halpern – Moen – Pyatt6:21

    xG 0.58–0.31 (65%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  4. Cammalleri – Plekanec – Kostitsyn14:48

    xG 0.65–0.68 (49%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpacek – Weber15:28

    xG 1.82–0.27 (87%)attempts 24–10goals 0–0

  2. Hamrlik – Wisniewski16:30

    xG 1.92–0.67 (74%)attempts 28–11goals 1–1

  3. Gill – Subban15:40

    xG 1.16–0.69 (63%)attempts 22–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 5.9 xGATL 3.3 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLATL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it ATL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #137 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.32 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
ATL 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 82% of the time.

MTL winsATL wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − ATL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).