Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 2, 2011·Pepsi Center, Denver

Vancouver Canucks 2, Colorado Avalanche 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 57% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN18010111229
COL01009113132

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:15VANAlexandre BolducAssists: Tanner Glass, Roberto Luongo · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P3 3:11VANMason RaymondGWGAssists: Alexandre Bolduc, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P3 13:35COLPaul StastnyAssists: Matt Duchene, John-Michael Liles · Wrist, 0.41 xG2–1
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 5:28COLRyan Wilson: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 5:28VANRyan Kesler: Diving2 min
  3. P1 7:56COLDavid Jones: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 12:37VANRaffi Torres: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 16:12VANKevin Bieksa: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 2:31VANKeith Ballard: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 13:55COLAdam Foote: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:55VANAlexandre Bolduc: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 13:55VANRaffi Torres: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 18:07COLMilan Hejduk: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 19:19VANChristian Ehrhoff: Tripping2 min
  12. P2 19:52COLKevin Shattenkirk: Hooking2 min
  13. P2 0:00VANRyan Kesler: Slashing2 min
  14. P2 0:00COLRyan O'Byrne: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 6:41VANRyan Kesler: High sticking2 min
  16. P3 7:36COLMilan Hejduk: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malhotra won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCOL
29Shots on goal32
2.5Expected goals2.9
50Shot attempts58
24Faceoffs won31
4Power plays5
18Penalty minutes14
16Hits14
12Blocked shots10
5Giveaways8
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBolduc – Glass – Raymond4:07

    xG 0.31–0.18 (64%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

  2. Samuelsson – Sedin – Sedin2:47

    xG 0.08–0.03 (76%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows7:42

    xG 0.12–0.11 (54%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Tambellini – Hansen8:08

    xG 0.05–0.16 (22%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Bieksa12:52

    xG 0.45–0.26 (64%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  2. Ehrhoff – Edler12:56

    xG 0.19–0.45 (30%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Alberts – Ballard11:19

    xG 0.10–1.20 (8%)attempts 7–17goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestPorter – Winnik – O'Reilly3:21

    xG 0.50–0.04 (93%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Hejduk – Stastny – Duchene2:27

    xG 0.44–0.02 (96%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  3. Mauldin – Dupuis – Galiardi2:06

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Hejduk – Fleischmann – Duchene5:47

    xG 0.27–0.05 (84%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLiles – O'Byrne5:32

    xG 0.71–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Liles – Shattenkirk6:27

    xG 0.68–0.47 (59%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  3. Hunwick – Shattenkirk5:37

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.9 xGVAN 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 19/100 · #958 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 57% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).