Mon, Jan 3, 2011·Air Canada Centre, Toronto
Boston Bruins 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 07 | 217 | 09 | 233 |
| TOR | 111 | 08 | 018 | 137 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 14:08TORMikhail GrabovskiAssists: Luke Schenn · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–1
- P2 7:56BOSNathan HortonAssists: Dennis Seidenberg · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
- P2 15:30BOSMarc SavardGWGAssists: Nathan Horton, Milan Lucic · Slap, 0.03 xG2–1
Penalties (4)
- P1 2:14TORMike Komisarek: Interference2 min
- P2 0:20BOSDennis Seidenberg: Cross checking2 min
- P2 10:35BOSMarc Savard: Roughing2 min
- P2 10:35TORClarke MacArthur: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Campbell won the faceoff against Grabovski
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestSavard – Horton – Lucic12:25
xG 0.41–0.21 (66%)attempts 17–4goals 2–0
- Thornton – Campbell – Marchand5:06
xG 0.08–0.13 (40%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
- Recchi – Bergeron – Seguin10:03
xG 0.23–0.34 (41%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0
- Ryder – Wheeler – Krejci16:54
xG 0.35–1.49 (19%)attempts 16–26goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Chara – Boychuk4:26
xG 0.13–0.21 (39%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0
- Seidenberg – Kampfer2:18
xG 0.01–0.11 (10%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
- Chara – Ference2:38
xG 0.00–0.13 (3%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forward lines
- bestCrabb – Kessel – Bozak13:41
xG 1.10–0.18 (86%)attempts 14–20goals 0–0
- Armstrong – Boyce – Versteeg9:05
xG 0.27–0.12 (68%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0
- Versteeg – Kessel – Bozak2:22
xG 0.10–0.04 (68%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0
- Orr – Sjostrom – Brent3:57
xG 0.00–0.18 (0%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestKaberle – Schenn16:12
xG 1.57–0.62 (72%)attempts 27–17goals 1–1
- Komisarek – Gunnarsson5:03
xG 0.39–0.16 (71%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0
- Beauchemin – Phaneuf15:26
xG 0.42–0.23 (65%)attempts 14–18goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (TOR − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).