Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 5, 2011·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Tampa Bay Lightning 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL0807117132
PIT52021615841

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:07PITEvgeni MalkinUnassisted · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 2:23PITChris ConnerGWGAssists: Ben Lovejoy, Matt Cooke · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:17PITTyler KennedyAssists: Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P1 7:42PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Pascal Dupuis · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–4
  5. P1 18:56PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Kris Letang · Slap, 0.41 xG0–5
  6. P2 12:54PITMark LetestuAssists: Tyler Kennedy, Alex Goligoski · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–6
  7. P2 19:49PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Alex Goligoski, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–7
  8. P3 2:25TBLAdam HallAssists: Nate Thompson, Dana Tyrell · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–7
  9. P3 3:38PITAlex GoligoskiAssists: Chris Conner, Ben Lovejoy · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–8
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 18:26TBLPavel Kubina: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:06TBLSteve Downie: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 2:37PITBen Lovejoy: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  4. P2 6:05TBLSteve Downie: Diving2 min
  5. P2 6:05PITMike Rupp: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 18:41TBLVictor Hedman: Boarding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:00PITBen Lovejoy: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 6:08TBLRyan Malone: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 6:08PITZbynek Michalek: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 6:08PITBrooks Orpik: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 6:08TBLRyan Malone: Cross checking2 min
  12. P3 7:40TBLSean Bergenheim: Boarding2 min
  13. P3 16:33PITSidney Crosby: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← TBL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLPIT
32Shots on goal41
2.5Expected goals3.4
56Shot attempts72
35Faceoffs won37
2Power plays4
14Penalty minutes10
23Hits32
21Blocked shots15
2Giveaways5
0Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestHall – Thompson – Tyrell7:23

    xG 0.57–0.07 (89%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos6:45

    xG 0.11–0.09 (56%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Malone – Stamkos2:10

    xG 0.25–0.24 (51%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  4. St. Louis – Lecavalier – Gagne2:44

    xG 0.03–0.13 (18%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKubina – Hedman5:28

    xG 0.51–0.16 (76%)attempts 5–6goals 0–2

  2. Clark – Hedman5:41

    xG 0.27–0.27 (49%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Kubina – Smaby4:46

    xG 0.14–0.16 (47%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Crosby10:49

    xG 0.70–0.26 (73%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  2. Malkin – Kennedy – Staal6:20

    xG 0.38–0.24 (61%)attempts 9–3goals 2–0

  3. Adams – Rupp – Talbot5:49

    xG 0.04–0.01 (77%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Conner – Letestu8:31

    xG 0.41–0.79 (34%)attempts 12–14goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Michalek15:38

    xG 1.06–0.46 (70%)attempts 21–14goals 1–1

  2. Goligoski – Lovejoy13:38

    xG 0.80–0.81 (50%)attempts 19–18goals 2–0

  3. Orpik – Letang13:09

    xG 0.44–0.50 (47%)attempts 17–10goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.4 xGTBL 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1041 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.47 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).