Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 6, 2011·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Nashville Predators 5, Los Angeles Kings 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.

LAK winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH01131027528
LAK0122608226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:16LAKKyle CliffordAssists: Marco Sturm, Anze Kopitar · Backhand, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:57LAKJarret StollPPAssists: Ryan Smyth, Anze Kopitar · Slap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:57NSHColin WilsonPPAssists: Ryan Suter, Sergei Kostitsyn · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:19NSHMarek SvatosAssists: Colin Wilson, Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:28NSHPatric HornqvistPPGWGAssists: Colin Wilson, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.20 xG3–2
  6. P3 9:10NSHSergei KostitsynAssists: Kevin Klein, Shane O'Brien · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:33NSHPatric HornqvistAssists: Shea Weber, Sergei Kostitsyn · Wrist, 0.30 xG5–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 10:33NSHPatric Hornqvist: Interference2 min
  2. P2 6:13NSHFrancis Bouillon: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 8:16LAKKyle Clifford: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:18LAKMatt Greene: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:42LAKWayne Simmonds: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 14:42NSHFrancis Bouillon: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 6:31LAKRyan Smyth: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Goc
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHLAK
28Shots on goal26
2.2Expected goals1.7
51Shot attempts51
35Faceoffs won29
3Power plays2
9Penalty minutes11
29Hits34
10Blocked shots9
7Giveaways12
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestSmithson – Ward – Spaling4:24

    xG 0.29–0.07 (82%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Legwand – Svatos – Wilson12:16

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  3. Goc – Kostitsyn – Hornqvist14:23

    xG 0.62–0.62 (50%)attempts 13–13goals 2–1

  4. Dumont – Smithson – Ward3:27

    xG 0.05–0.06 (45%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouillon – Klein12:21

    xG 0.41–0.11 (79%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Weber18:34

    xG 0.57–0.47 (55%)attempts 16–13goals 1–0

  3. O'Brien – Franson10:11

    xG 0.13–0.27 (33%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. Smyth – Handzus – Williams12:31

    xG 0.45–0.45 (50%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  2. Sturm – Stoll – Clifford8:18

    xG 0.10–0.14 (43%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Brown – Kopitar – Simmonds10:16

    xG 0.13–0.24 (34%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartinez – Doughty4:06

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 0–0

  2. Scuderi – Johnson2:54

    xG 0.19–0.04 (82%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Harrold – Drewiske2:48

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 1.7 xGNSH 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #337 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.35 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.

LAK winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).