Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 7, 2011·Honda Center, Anaheim

Columbus Blue Jackets 0, Anaheim Ducks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 67% of the time.

ANA winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ01007010027
ANA1921139629

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:48ANATeemu SelannePPGWGAssists: Saku Koivu, Lubomir Visnovsky · Slap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:02ANATeemu SelannePPAssists: Cam Fowler, Lubomir Visnovsky · Slap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P2 13:02ANAMatt BeleskeyAssists: Maxim Lapierre, Toni Lydman · Slap, 0.02 xG0–3
  4. P3 1:26ANABobby RyanAssists: Corey Perry, Cam Fowler · Tip-in, 0.33 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:55ANABobby RyanPPAssists: Cam Fowler, Joffrey Lupul · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–5
  6. P3 15:22ANABrandon McMillanSHAssists: Matt Beleskey, Luca Sbisa · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–6
Penalties (20)
  1. P1 5:35CBJMatt Calvert: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:45ANAAndy Sutton: Interference2 min
  3. P1 10:57CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:57ANAGeorge Parros: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 3:15ANALubomir Visnovsky: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 6:14CBJSamuel Pahlsson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 10:14ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 10:14ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 10:14CBJJared Boll: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 10:14CBJJared Boll: High sticking2 min
  11. P2 19:32CBJDerick Brassard: Interference2 min
  12. P2 19:32ANAMatt Beleskey: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 7:35CBJFedor Tyutin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  14. P3 10:27CBJAndrew Murray: Hooking2 min
  15. P3 11:42CBJDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 11:42ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  17. P3 14:02CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  18. P3 14:02ANAAndy Sutton: Instigator2 min
  19. P3 14:02ANAAndy Sutton: Fighting5 min
  20. P3 14:02ANAAndy Sutton: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lapierre won the faceoff against Pahlsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJANA
27Shots on goal29
2.1Expected goals3.1
46Shot attempts41
29Faceoffs won25
3Power plays4
26Penalty minutes34
23Hits25
6Blocked shots7
10Giveaways7
4Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Brassard – Voracek11:14

    xG 0.23–0.11 (68%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Huselius – Vermette – Nash13:57

    xG 0.58–0.49 (54%)attempts 13–8goals 0–1

  3. MacKenzie – Boll – Calvert4:43

    xG 0.12–0.09 (59%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Pahlsson – Murray – Dorsett9:38

    xG 0.26–0.47 (35%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Stralman15:31

    xG 0.76–0.44 (63%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

  2. Klesla – Methot17:06

    xG 0.54–0.46 (54%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  3. Hejda – Russell12:09

    xG 0.20–0.29 (41%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSelanne – Koivu – Blake10:54

    xG 0.50–0.43 (54%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  2. Marchant – Parros – Sexton9:09

    xG 0.14–0.24 (37%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Lupul – Lapierre – McMillan8:46

    xG 0.07–0.17 (28%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Ryan – Beleskey8:27

    xG 0.10–0.36 (21%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVisnovsky – Fowler2:30

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Lydman – Visnovsky15:03

    xG 0.34–0.50 (40%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  3. Lilja – Fowler15:16

    xG 0.29–0.47 (38%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.1 xGCBJ 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1179 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 67% of the time.

ANA winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).