Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 12, 2011·Centre Bell, Montreal

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Montréal Canadiens 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 79% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT19214213536
MTL161907222

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:57PITAlex GoligoskiAssists: Chris Kunitz, Mark Letestu · Slap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:15MTLTomas PlekanecAssists: Mathieu Darche, Benoit Pouliot · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:15MTLDavid DesharnaisAssists: P.K. Subban, Tom Pyatt · Deflected, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:12PITTyler KennedyPPAssists: Kris Letang, Jordan Staal · Snap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:49PITJordan StaalPPGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:33PITAlex GoligoskiPPAssists: Jordan Staal, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.48 xG4–2
  7. P3 11:29PITChris KunitzPPAssists: Kris Letang, Alex Goligoski · Slap, 0.01 xG5–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:39PITAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:42PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:04MTLBenoit Pouliot: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:59MTLJames Wisniewski: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 18:20MTLMax Pacioretty: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  6. P3 1:11MTLBenoit Pouliot: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 4:40MTLBenoit Pouliot: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 6:50MTLP.K. Subban: Fighting5 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:50PITMark Letestu: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 10:09MTLJames Wisniewski: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 12:26MTLScott Gomez: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 12:26PITBrooks Orpik: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 18:57PITAlex Goligoski: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Gomez
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITMTL
36Shots on goal22
3.6Expected goals1.9
61Shot attempts48
28Faceoffs won33
6Power plays3
13Penalty minutes19
35Hits30
17Blocked shots17
10Giveaways18
4Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Kennedy – Staal6:11

    xG 0.29–0.05 (85%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Rupp – Talbot – Conner5:17

    xG 0.30–0.10 (75%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Conner – Staal2:04

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Kunitz – Malkin7:02

    xG 0.33–0.45 (43%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGoligoski – Letang3:35

    xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Letang9:16

    xG 0.23–0.27 (46%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Engelland – Goligoski8:20

    xG 0.14–0.35 (29%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestDarche – Plekanec – Pouliot7:04

    xG 0.57–0.22 (72%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Halpern – Moen – Kostitsyn6:05

    xG 0.27–0.07 (80%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Pyatt – Desharnais – Eller10:19

    xG 0.30–0.39 (43%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  4. Gomez – Gionta – Pacioretty9:29

    xG 0.04–0.34 (11%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGill – Wisniewski2:07

    xG 0.34–0.01 (96%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Hamrlik – Wisniewski15:02

    xG 0.40–0.42 (49%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1

  3. Gill – Subban9:18

    xG 0.38–0.43 (47%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 1.9 xGPIT 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #498 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.53 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 79% of the time.

MTL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).