Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 14, 2011·Verizon Center, Washington

Vancouver Canucks 4, Washington Capitals 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 91% of the time.

WSH winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN11521416435
WSH1808111227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:50WSHMatt HendricksAssists: Boyd Gordon, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:15VANAlexander EdlerAssists: Jannik Hansen, Christian Ehrhoff · Slap, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:46VANChristian EhrhoffPPAssists: Ryan Kesler, Daniel Sedin · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:59VANDaniel SedinGWGAssists: Jannik Hansen · Snap, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:21WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Brooks Laich · Snap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:18VANDaniel SedinENAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.69 xG4–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 3:02WSHJason Chimera: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P2 9:15WSHAlex Ovechkin: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 16:38VANAlexandre Burrows: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 18:40VANAlexander Edler: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 18:49WSHMike Green: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 2:35VANTanner Glass: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
47% to win53% to win
← VAN attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Steckel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANWSH
35Shots on goal27
4.9Expected goals1.8
60Shot attempts49
19Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
25Hits23
11Blocked shots12
8Giveaways10
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestBolduc – Glass – Hansen6:27

    xG 1.22–0.14 (90%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Kesler – Tambellini – Raymond14:10

    xG 1.23–0.45 (73%)attempts 18–10goals 0–1

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows11:38

    xG 0.79–0.40 (66%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

  4. Malhotra – Samuelsson – Torres9:44

    xG 0.17–0.13 (56%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Edler12:27

    xG 1.10–0.21 (84%)attempts 16–11goals 2–1

  2. Hamhuis – Ballard2:04

    xG 0.88–0.06 (94%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Ehrhoff3:19

    xG 0.71–0.02 (98%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestKnuble – Ovechkin – Backstrom5:52

    xG 0.26–0.10 (72%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Knuble – Laich – Johansson6:31

    xG 0.11–0.30 (28%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Fehr – Ovechkin – Backstrom10:03

    xG 0.17–0.40 (30%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

  4. Hendricks – Steckel – Gordon10:57

    xG 0.48–0.81 (37%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Erskine13:01

    xG 0.50–0.45 (53%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. Alzner – Carlson12:31

    xG 0.42–1.21 (26%)attempts 13–16goals 2–0

  3. Schultz – Green17:34

    xG 0.38–2.33 (14%)attempts 11–28goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 1.8 xGVAN 4.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #663 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 91% of the time.

WSH winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).