Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 18, 2011·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 4, Edmonton Oilers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 56% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN280929426
EDM01101219132

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:39MINMatt CullenAssists: Eric Nystrom, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Backhand, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:25MINBrent BurnsGWGAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Martin Havlat · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P3 10:04MINPierre-Marc BouchardAssists: Eric Nystrom, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P3 12:07MINAndrew BrunettePPAssists: Matt Cullen, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–0
  5. P3 16:14EDMMagnus PaajarviPPAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Taylor Chorney · Snap, 0.09 xG4–1
Penalties (20)
  1. P1 9:19MINNick Schultz: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 17:26MINCal Clutterbuck: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P2 3:20MINBrad Staubitz: Interference2 min
  4. P2 9:38MINAntti Miettinen: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:58MINGreg Zanon: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:07MINGreg Zanon: Interference2 min
  7. P3 4:52EDMLinus Omark: Holding2 min
  8. P3 12:02EDMZack Stortini: Fighting5 min · PPG
  9. P3 12:02MINBrent Burns: Fighting5 min · PPG
  10. P3 12:02EDMZack Stortini: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 12:02MINBrent Burns: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 12:02EDMTheo Peckham: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 12:02MINMartin Havlat: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 12:02EDMTheo Peckham: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 14:23EDMLadislav Smid: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 15:52EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Fighting5 min
  17. P3 15:52MINBrad Staubitz: Fighting5 min
  18. P3 15:52MINBrad Staubitz: Instigator2 min
  19. P3 15:52MINBrad Staubitz: Game misconduct10 min
  20. P3 18:48EDMTheo Peckham: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Cogliano
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
26Shots on goal32
2.3Expected goals2.6
45Shot attempts63
26Faceoffs won26
3Power plays7
46Penalty minutes38
16Hits22
18Blocked shots4
18Giveaways13
15Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestHavlat – Brodziak – Clutterbuck8:59

    xG 0.72–0.14 (84%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Bouchard – Nystrom6:19

    xG 0.60–0.17 (77%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  3. Madden – Kobasew – Staubitz4:20

    xG 0.04–0.05 (45%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Brunette – Miettinen – Koivu9:06

    xG 0.09–0.14 (40%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarker – Spurgeon10:15

    xG 0.67–0.13 (84%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  2. Zanon – Stoner12:24

    xG 0.89–0.38 (70%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  3. Schultz – Burns12:16

    xG 0.25–0.31 (44%)attempts 7–13goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJacques – Fraser – Stortini5:41

    xG 0.24–0.14 (64%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Reddox – Cogliano7:43

    xG 0.09–0.11 (46%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Cogliano – Omark – Paajarvi2:19

    xG 0.01–0.06 (18%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Penner – Gagner – Hall6:37

    xG 0.24–0.34 (41%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFoster – Chorney9:23

    xG 0.42–0.11 (79%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Gilbert – Petry2:40

    xG 0.07–0.09 (44%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Smid – Peckham2:07

    xG 0.00–0.15 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.6 xGMIN 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1016 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 56% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).