Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 19, 2011·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Florida Panthers 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 64% of the time.

FLA winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CBJ1701111713338
FLA215060901231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:43FLADavid BoothAssists: Mike Santorelli, Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:21FLACory StillmanAssists: Radek Dvorak, Dmitry Kulikov · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:41CBJFedor TyutinUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:07CBJAntoine VermetteAssists: Grant Clitsome, Fedor Tyutin · Tip-in, 0.34 xG2–2
  5. OT 4:06CBJR.J. UmbergerPPGWGAssists: Grant Clitsome, Rick Nash · Tip-in, 0.22 xG3–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 15:01CBJDerick Brassard: Holding2 min
  2. P2 10:46FLADarcy Hordichuk: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 10:46CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 11:02CBJDerek MacKenzie: Charging2 min
  5. P2 12:04FLACory Stillman: Holding2 min
  6. P2 14:08CBJR.J. Umberger: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 19:33FLAMike Weaver: Interference2 min
  8. P3 12:53CBJMatt Calvert: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. OT 3:33FLADmitry Kulikov: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
47% to win53% to win
← CBJ attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pahlsson won the faceoff against Reasoner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJFLA
38Shots on goal31
3.0Expected goals2.2
66Shot attempts50
33Faceoffs won32
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
37Hits27
13Blocked shots13
0Giveaways4
5Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestMacKenzie – Boll – Calvert5:35

    xG 0.28–0.03 (91%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Nash – Brassard – Voracek14:29

    xG 0.61–0.59 (51%)attempts 17–16goals 0–0

  3. Vermette – Umberger – Calvert2:30

    xG 0.13–0.15 (46%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Huselius – Vermette – Umberger7:20

    xG 0.35–0.39 (47%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClitsome – Russell17:36

    xG 0.82–0.64 (56%)attempts 20–15goals 0–0

  2. Methot – Stralman13:17

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  3. Klesla – Tyutin12:00

    xG 0.23–0.53 (30%)attempts 9–9goals 1–2

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestWeiss – Frolik – Dadonov11:26

    xG 0.51–0.14 (79%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Olesz – Booth – Santorelli8:17

    xG 0.46–0.29 (61%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  3. Hordichuk – Bernier – Matthias5:28

    xG 0.17–0.11 (62%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Stillman – Dvorak – Reasoner11:07

    xG 0.45–0.80 (36%)attempts 8–18goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeaver – Garrison14:27

    xG 0.63–0.20 (76%)attempts 16–12goals 0–0

  2. Allen – Wideman13:09

    xG 0.76–0.34 (69%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  3. Wideman – Ellerby2:46

    xG 0.11–0.03 (77%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.2 xGCBJ 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLACBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #290 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.79 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 64% of the time.

FLA winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).