Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 22, 2011·HP Pavilion at San Jose, San Jose

Minnesota Wild 3, San Jose Sharks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 80% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1711019326
SJS17225110442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:33SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Jason Demers · Snap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:19MINMikko KoivuPPAssists: Brent Burns · Slap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:56SJSDevin SetoguchiAssists: Patrick Marleau, Dan Boyle · Slap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:36SJSDevin SetoguchiPPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Patrick Marleau · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:27MINMikko KoivuPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Brent Burns · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:57SJSBenn FerrieroGWGAssists: Joe Thornton, Jamie McGinn · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:35MINBrent BurnsAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 6:04MINMatt Cullen: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 12:21SJSDouglas Murray: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:09SJSBenn Ferriero: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 17:42SJSLogan Couture: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 1:45MINClayton Stoner: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 5:43MINClayton Stoner: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  7. P2 6:54SJSNiclas Wallin: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 14:52SJSJoe Pavelski: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 0:30SJSDany Heatley: Holding2 min
  10. P3 0:00MINAndrew Brunette: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cullen won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSJS
26Shots on goal42
1.9Expected goals3.9
46Shot attempts66
29Faceoffs won35
6Power plays3
8Penalty minutes12
16Hits22
13Blocked shots11
11Giveaways13
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Madden – Kobasew – Staubitz2:26

    xG 0.04–0.04 (52%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Madden – Kobasew – Nystrom2:12

    xG 0.02–0.07 (21%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Brunette – Miettinen – Koivu8:19

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  4. Havlat – Brodziak – Clutterbuck8:40

    xG 0.27–0.70 (28%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Burns3:27

    xG 0.23–0.09 (71%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Burns4:14

    xG 0.08–0.19 (30%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  3. Barker – Spurgeon9:07

    xG 0.56–1.04 (35%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMayers – Eager – McCarthy3:34

    xG 0.65–0.09 (88%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Marleau – Pavelski11:05

    xG 0.60–0.04 (93%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Wellwood – McGinn – Ferriero10:43

    xG 0.43–0.12 (78%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  4. Heatley – Setoguchi – Couture12:01

    xG 0.80–0.52 (61%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWallin – Demers12:37

    xG 1.44–0.36 (80%)attempts 20–11goals 2–0

  2. Huskins – Vlasic14:59

    xG 0.66–0.16 (81%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  3. Boyle – Murray14:16

    xG 0.74–0.38 (66%)attempts 16–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.9 xGMIN 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #493 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.55 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 80% of the time.

SJS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).