Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 1, 2011·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Calgary Flames 3, Nashville Predators 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 50% of the time.

NSH winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CGY0806210041328
NSH1110619010227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:43NSHMartin EratAssists: Sergei Kostitsyn, Marcel Goc · Tip-in, 0.24 xG0–1
  2. P3 2:57CGYMatt StajanAssists: Tim Jackman, Curtis Glencross · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P3 5:24NSHPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Shea Weber, Sergei Kostitsyn · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P3 9:04CGYCory SarichAssists: Alex Tanguay, Brendan Morrison · Snap, 0.09 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. CGY Rene Bourque scored
  2. 2. NSH Martin Erat stopped
  3. 3. CGY Alex Tanguay stopped
  4. 4. NSH Cody Franson stopped
  5. 5. CGY Olli Jokinen stopped
  6. 6. NSH David Legwand stopped
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:20NSHNick Spaling: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 3:24NSHRyan Suter: Closing hand on puck2 min
  3. P1 11:43CGYAdam Pardy: Interference2 min
  4. P1 15:52CGYRobyn Regehr: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 1:37NSHNick Spaling: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 5:32NSHJerred Smithson: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 19:13CGYMiikka Kiprusoff: Interference2 min
  8. P3 4:56CGYOlli Jokinen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 16:32NSHNick Spaling: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win53% to win
← CGY attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jokinen won the faceoff against Smithson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYNSH
28Shots on goal27
2.1Expected goals2.1
47Shot attempts55
19Faceoffs won27
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
17Hits21
16Blocked shots11
16Giveaways13
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestHagman – Stajan – Glencross6:06

    xG 0.43–0.25 (63%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Kostopoulos – Stajan – Glencross2:00

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Jokinen – Moss – Bourque6:37

    xG 0.23–0.21 (52%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Morrison – Iginla – Tanguay8:52

    xG 0.23–0.31 (43%)attempts 6–4goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRegehr – Bouwmeester13:01

    xG 0.34–0.26 (56%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  2. Sarich – Giordano9:43

    xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  3. Babchuk – Pardy9:33

    xG 0.21–0.27 (43%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestErat – Goc – Kostitsyn8:00

    xG 0.53–0.05 (91%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Dumont – Halischuk – Mueller7:21

    xG 0.22–0.07 (75%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Smithson – Ward – Spaling6:18

    xG 0.04–0.20 (17%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Legwand – Hornqvist – Wilson8:40

    xG 0.15–0.39 (29%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Weber14:04

    xG 0.54–0.24 (69%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  2. O'Brien – Franson8:07

    xG 0.22–0.16 (58%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  3. Sulzer – Franson3:39

    xG 0.05–0.05 (49%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.1 xGCGY 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #271 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.05 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 50% of the time.

NSH winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).