Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 3, 2011·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 4, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN2511713425
COL012110219341

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:33MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Nick Schultz, Cal Clutterbuck · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:01MINAndrew BrunetteAssists: Antti Miettinen, Mikko Koivu · Wrap-around, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:47COLMilan HejdukAssists: Kevin Porter, Kyle Cumiskey · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:50MINAndrew BrunetteAssists: Mikko Koivu, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–1
  5. P3 0:45COLMilan HejdukAssists: Chris Stewart, Adam Foote · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:26MINPierre-Marc BouchardGWGAssists: Martin Havlat · Backhand, 0.27 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:49COLChris StewartAssists: Brandon Yip, TJ Galiardi · Wrist, 0.24 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 11:47MINBrad Staubitz: Roughing2 min
  2. P2 6:25COLBrandon Yip: Fighting5 min
  3. P2 6:25MINCam Barker: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 9:33COLMilan Hejduk: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 14:50COLRyan O'Byrne: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 17:35COLKevin Shattenkirk: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 3:55MINMartin Havlat: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Duchene won the faceoff against Brodziak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
25Shots on goal41
3.2Expected goals3.2
43Shot attempts56
27Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
26Hits27
8Blocked shots9
4Giveaways7
4Takeaways19

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Miettinen – Koivu8:34

    xG 0.54–0.05 (92%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Havlat – Brodziak – Clutterbuck6:55

    xG 0.34–0.20 (63%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  3. Cullen – Kobasew – Bouchard6:40

    xG 0.14–0.21 (40%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Madden – Kobasew – Nystrom2:48

    xG 0.06–0.17 (26%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Stoner13:36

    xG 0.70–0.36 (66%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  2. Barker – Spurgeon6:52

    xG 0.26–0.06 (82%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Burns14:45

    xG 0.64–0.49 (57%)attempts 13–9goals 2–2

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestHejduk – Stewart – Duchene5:26

    xG 0.39–0.03 (92%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Porter – Stewart – Duchene3:14

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Porter – Yip – Stastny2:14

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Yip – Winnik2:01

    xG 0.02–0.18 (8%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Liles – Shattenkirk2:21

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. Wilson – Shattenkirk7:04

    xG 0.14–0.14 (50%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Liles – O'Byrne9:18

    xG 0.34–0.35 (50%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.2 xGMIN 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #547 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.20 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).