Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 4, 2011·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Edmonton Oilers 3, St. Louis Blues 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 54% of the time.

STL winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM11321009332
STL2528113526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:46STLT.J. OshieAssists: Alexander Steen, Patrik Berglund · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:47EDMSam GagnerAssists: Ladislav Smid, Linus Omark · Snap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:07STLAlex PietrangeloAssists: Brad Boyes, Andy McDonald · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:19STLMatt D'AgostiniPPAssists: Nikita Nikitin, Alexander Steen · Deflected, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:46STLBrad BoyesGWGAssists: Patrik Berglund, Erik Johnson · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–4
  6. P2 14:36EDMTaylor HallAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Jordan Eberle · Deflected, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P2 18:52EDMTheo PeckhamAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Jordan Eberle · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:58STLBrad WinchesterAssists: Jay McClement, B.J. Crombeen · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:53STLCam Janssen: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 1:53EDMJim Vandermeer: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:11STLB.J. Crombeen: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:43EDMJim Vandermeer: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 9:43EDMJim Vandermeer: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 15:14STLAndy McDonald: Holding2 min
  7. P3 10:43EDMTaylor Hall: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 10:43EDMLadislav Smid: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 10:43STLT.J. Oshie: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 19:31STLDavid Backes: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Horcoff
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMSTL
32Shots on goal26
2.8Expected goals3.0
58Shot attempts54
33Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
20Hits28
18Blocked shots18
4Giveaways2
6Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHorcoff – Hemsky – Jones9:54

    xG 0.54–0.31 (64%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  2. Gagner – Omark – Paajarvi11:29

    xG 0.70–0.61 (53%)attempts 13–10goals 1–2

  3. Horcoff – Hemsky – Reddox3:07

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – Eberle – Hall11:52

    xG 0.88–1.36 (39%)attempts 17–17goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – Peckham13:36

    xG 1.17–0.28 (81%)attempts 18–10goals 2–1

  2. Vandermeer – Foster10:57

    xG 0.40–0.35 (54%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Vandermeer – Petry2:14

    xG 0.00–0.21 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Winchester – Janssen – Crombeen2:14

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. McDonald – Boyes – Backes11:44

    xG 0.53–0.62 (46%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  3. McClement – Sobotka – D'Agostini8:16

    xG 0.14–0.28 (34%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Steen – Oshie – Berglund9:26

    xG 0.41–0.58 (42%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJackman – Polak20:26

    xG 1.91–1.19 (62%)attempts 22–26goals 1–2

  2. Johnson – Pietrangelo16:33

    xG 0.60–0.68 (47%)attempts 14–14goals 2–0

  3. Strachan – Nikitin8:56

    xG 0.24–0.45 (34%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.0 xGEDM 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #254 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.32 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 54% of the time.

STL winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).