Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 4, 2011·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Vancouver Canucks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 78% of the time.

VAN winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI010216119345
VAN19112211432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:06VANChristian EhrhoffAssists: Tanner Glass, Cody Hodgson · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:06CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Fernando Pisani, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:31CHINick BoyntonAssists: Jonathan Toews, Troy Brouwer · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:44VANMikael SamuelssonPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Dan Hamhuis · Slap, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 7:47CHIDave BollandAssists: Bryan Bickell, Brent Seabrook · Deflected, 0.17 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:09VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Mikael Samuelsson, Daniel Sedin · Snap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 16:00VANDaniel SedinGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexandre Burrows · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 9:19VANMikael Samuelsson: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 18:34CHITroy Brouwer: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 11:29VANRyan Kesler: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 14:31CHIViktor Stalberg: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 14:31VANChristian Ehrhoff: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 14:31VANChristian Ehrhoff: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 15:44VANKeith Ballard: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 17:56CHIJake Dowell: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 3:27CHIViktor Stalberg: Holding2 min
  10. P3 9:42CHIBrent Seabrook: Holding2 min · PPG
  11. P3 17:01VANKevin Bieksa: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
47% to win53% to win
← CHI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Bolland
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIVAN
45Shots on goal32
3.6Expected goals2.0
76Shot attempts61
23Faceoffs won37
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
21Hits17
21Blocked shots16
5Giveaways8
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBrouwer – Toews – Kane10:31

    xG 0.84–0.17 (83%)attempts 19–10goals 1–0

  2. Hossa – Kopecky – Sharp9:18

    xG 0.53–0.17 (76%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Dowell – Skille – Stalberg4:47

    xG 0.27–0.16 (63%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Pisani – Bolland – Bickell8:26

    xG 0.09–0.72 (12%)attempts 3–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Hjalmarsson14:36

    xG 0.79–0.14 (85%)attempts 23–6goals 0–0

  2. Boynton – Leddy8:00

    xG 0.70–0.39 (64%)attempts 9–13goals 2–1

  3. Boynton – Keith2:01

    xG 0.08–0.09 (47%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows11:00

    xG 0.49–0.37 (57%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  2. Tambellini – Glass – Hodgson4:41

    xG 0.26–0.23 (53%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Malhotra – Torres – Hansen9:56

    xG 0.26–0.55 (33%)attempts 10–15goals 0–2

  4. Samuelsson – Kesler – Raymond10:35

    xG 0.06–0.41 (13%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Ehrhoff – Rome14:57

    xG 0.57–0.71 (45%)attempts 15–19goals 1–0

  2. Ballard – Tanev10:40

    xG 0.47–0.64 (42%)attempts 9–11goals 0–1

  3. Hamhuis – Bieksa15:24

    xG 0.33–0.87 (27%)attempts 16–23goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.0 xGCHI 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #92 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.48 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 78% of the time.

VAN winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).