Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 9, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 2, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL11001015225
MIN2141406324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:00MINAntti MiettinenPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Brent Burns · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:11COLDavid JonesAssists: Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:51MINMartin HavlatAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Cal Clutterbuck · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 10:42MINJohn MaddenGWGAssists: Matt Cullen, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:23COLDavid JonesAssists: Milan Hejduk · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 14:03COLRyan O'Byrne: Boarding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:06MINBrent Burns: Interference2 min
  3. P2 5:16MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 4:48COLMatt Hunwick: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 6:27COLDaniel Winnik: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 7:23MINBrent Burns: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 7:23COLBrandon Yip: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 7:23MINCal Clutterbuck: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:23COLRyan Wilson: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 7:23MINMartin Havlat: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 11:37MINBrent Burns: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  12. P3 18:09COLMilan Hejduk: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
25Shots on goal24
1.4Expected goals2.7
51Shot attempts55
25Faceoffs won27
4Power plays4
12Penalty minutes12
20Hits37
8Blocked shots13
1Giveaways3
2Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Stastny – Stewart – Galiardi9:28

    xG 0.13–0.19 (40%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  2. Porter – Yip – Winnik2:26

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Dupuis – Winnik – McLeod2:24

    xG 0.01–0.13 (9%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. Hejduk – Jones – Duchene11:01

    xG 0.32–0.50 (39%)attempts 9–11goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunwick – Shattenkirk4:12

    xG 0.34–0.15 (69%)attempts 5–5goals 2–0

  2. Wilson – Shattenkirk4:05

    xG 0.14–0.07 (66%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Liles – O'Byrne9:28

    xG 0.26–0.29 (47%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Miettinen – Koivu11:26

    xG 0.39–0.16 (71%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  2. Havlat – Brodziak – Clutterbuck8:27

    xG 0.40–0.30 (57%)attempts 10–8goals 1–2

  3. Cullen – Kobasew – Bouchard7:31

    xG 0.19–0.10 (66%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Madden – Nystrom – Staubitz5:18

    xG 0.16–0.14 (53%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarker – Spurgeon9:15

    xG 0.53–0.22 (70%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Burns16:58

    xG 0.66–0.50 (57%)attempts 19–16goals 1–1

  3. Zanon – Stoner15:36

    xG 0.44–0.29 (60%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.7 xGCOL 1.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 39/100 · #709 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.33 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).