Thu, Feb 10, 2011·BankAtlantic Center, Sunrise
Buffalo Sabres 3, Florida Panthers 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | 08 | 17 | 19 | 13 | 327 |
| FLA | 05 | 112 | 16 | 03 | 226 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 10:22BUFMike WeberAssists: Jason Pominville, Jochen Hecht · Snap, 0.02 xG1–0
- P2 18:38FLASteve BernierPPAssists: Jason Garrison, Dennis Wideman · Tip-in, 0.18 xG1–1
- P3 8:59BUFThomas VanekAssists: Jason Pominville, Tyler Myers · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
- P3 10:03FLAMarty ReasonerAssists: Dennis Wideman · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
- OT 4:55BUFTyler MyersGWGAssists: Nathan Gerbe · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
Penalties (5)
- P1 10:32FLAScott Timmins: Tripping2 min
- P1 16:10BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
- P1 16:10FLADarcy Hordichuk: Fighting5 min
- P2 16:59BUFNathan Gerbe: Slashing2 min · PPG
- P3 4:59FLABryan Allen: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Gaustad won the faceoff against Reasoner
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Buffalo Sabres
Forward lines
- bestNiedermayer – Grier – Gaustad14:17
xG 0.73–0.38 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0
- McCormick – Gerbe – Byron6:16
xG 0.25–0.08 (77%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0
- Connolly – Stafford – Ennis11:47
xG 0.22–0.24 (48%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1
- Hecht – Pominville – Vanek11:07
xG 0.16–0.23 (40%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestMorrisonn – Weber15:47
xG 0.82–0.22 (79%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0
- Sekera – Myers17:42
xG 0.33–0.25 (57%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0
- Leopold – Butler12:52
xG 0.31–0.31 (50%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestWeiss – Higgins – Skille15:12
xG 0.57–0.32 (64%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1
- Bernier – Booth – Santorelli13:02
xG 0.34–0.18 (65%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0
- Dvorak – Reasoner – Olesz14:03
xG 0.28–0.38 (42%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0
- Hordichuk – Thomas – Timmins2:56
xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestEllerby – Kulikov8:43
xG 0.39–0.29 (57%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0
- Allen – Weaver2:26
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0
- Allen – Wideman18:52
xG 0.45–0.49 (48%)attempts 13–19goals 1–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (FLA − BUF), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).