Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 12, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

St. Louis Blues 1, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 65% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL0511307125
MIN11221207331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:51MINCal ClutterbuckAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:07MINAntti MiettinenPPGWGAssists: Andrew Brunette · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:22MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Brent Burns · Slap, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 14:48STLPatrik BerglundPPAssists: T.J. Oshie, Brad Boyes · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–3
Penalties (20)
  1. P1 6:13MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:44STLCarlo Colaiacovo: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:13STLMatt D'Agostini: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 15:13MINCam Barker: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 16:48STLCam Janssen: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 16:48MINBrad Staubitz: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 16:48STLCam Janssen: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 3:58STLAlexander Steen: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  9. P2 7:39MINBrad Staubitz: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 8:18STLJaroslav Halak: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P2 13:51MINGreg Zanon: High sticking2 min · PPG
  12. P2 19:34STLEric Brewer: Holding2 min
  13. P3 2:20MINBrent Burns: Holding2 min
  14. P3 14:03STLAlexander Steen: Interference2 min
  15. P3 0:00STLDavid Backes: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 0:00MINGreg Zanon: Slashing2 min
  17. P3 0:00STLAlexander Steen: Roughing2 min
  18. P3 0:00MINClayton Stoner: Fighting5 min
  19. P3 0:00MINClayton Stoner: Game misconduct10 min
  20. P3 0:00STLDavid Backes: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← STL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDonald won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLMIN
25Shots on goal31
1.4Expected goals2.1
51Shot attempts48
32Faceoffs won29
4Power plays6
39Penalty minutes35
20Hits36
6Blocked shots17
1Giveaways4
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Winchester – Janssen – Crombeen2:03

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  2. Steen – Oshie – Berglund7:19

    xG 0.11–0.13 (45%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. McClement – Sobotka – D'Agostini7:57

    xG 0.18–0.21 (46%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. McDonald – Boyes – Backes9:42

    xG 0.18–0.33 (35%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Brewer – Colaiacovo13:08

    xG 0.20–0.22 (47%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Pietrangelo13:07

    xG 0.28–0.42 (40%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Polak10:31

    xG 0.02–0.45 (5%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Miettinen – Koivu8:28

    xG 0.40–0.07 (85%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Havlat – Brodziak – Clutterbuck7:05

    xG 0.28–0.14 (67%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Madden – Kobasew – Nystrom2:13

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Madden – Nystrom – Staubitz3:30

    xG 0.06–0.08 (44%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Stoner13:57

    xG 0.73–0.19 (80%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0

  2. Schultz – Burns13:13

    xG 0.41–0.25 (63%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. Barker – Spurgeon10:14

    xG 0.03–0.17 (16%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.1 xGSTL 1.4 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #984 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.77 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 65% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).