Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 15, 2011·St. Pete Times Forum, Tampa

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 61% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI1421506042429
TBL0123608011327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:42PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Claude Giroux, Jeff Carter · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:59TBLDominic MooreAssists: Adam Hall · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:33PHIScott HartnellPPAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Andrej Meszaros · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:48PHIDarroll PoweUnassisted · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:55TBLVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Marc-Andre Bergeron, Martin St. Louis · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P2 10:48TBLTeddy PurcellAssists: Pavel Kubina, Mike Vernace · Snap, 0.06 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Daniel Brière stopped
  2. 2. TBL Victor Hedman stopped
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  4. 4. TBL Dominic Moore scored
  5. 5. PHI Mike Richards scored
  6. 6. TBL Adam Hall stopped
  7. 7. PHI Kris Versteeg stopped
  8. 8. TBL Simon Gagne stopped
  9. 9. PHI Jeff Carter stopped
  10. 10. TBL Vincent Lecavalier stopped
  11. 11. PHI Ville Leino stopped
  12. 12. TBL Steven Stamkos stopped
  13. 13. PHI Kimmo Timonen scored
  14. 14. TBL Martin St. Louis stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 7:13PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 7:13TBLRandy Jones: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 17:49PHIDaniel Brière: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 1:21TBLSteven Stamkos: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 4:32PHISean O'Donnell: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 6:59TBLPavel Kubina: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P2 8:19PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P2 8:48TBLSteven Stamkos: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  9. P2 11:34PHIMike Richards: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 11:34TBLSteven Stamkos: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 11:34PHIMike Richards: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 4:15TBLMattias Ohlund: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Richards won the faceoff against Lecavalier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHITBL
29Shots on goal27
2.5Expected goals1.9
56Shot attempts54
36Faceoffs won33
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
30Hits24
17Blocked shots14
9Giveaways12
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Giroux – van Riemsdyk7:33

    xG 0.30–0.17 (63%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Betts – Carcillo – Powe3:54

    xG 0.05–0.02 (75%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Brière – Hartnell – Leino10:54

    xG 0.15–0.21 (41%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  4. Richards – Versteeg – Nodl11:49

    xG 0.22–0.34 (39%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTimonen – Coburn15:31

    xG 0.57–0.27 (68%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  2. Pronger – Carle14:41

    xG 0.16–0.12 (56%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  3. Coburn – Carle2:19

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestHall – Moore – Bergenheim11:01

    xG 0.57–0.33 (64%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  2. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos11:59

    xG 0.25–0.17 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Lecavalier – Gagne – Purcell12:07

    xG 0.33–0.27 (56%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClark – Bergeron6:49

    xG 0.29–0.07 (81%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Clark – Hedman3:33

    xG 0.21–0.15 (58%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Kubina – Jones2:05

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.9 xGPHI 2.5 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #230 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 61% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).