Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 22, 2011·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Edmonton Oilers 1, Minnesota Wild 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM081706121
MIN0517311423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 9:23MINMartin HavlatAssists: Greg Zanon, Clayton Stoner · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 17:37EDMKurtis FosterAssists: Linus Omark, Sam Gagner · Snap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:28MINKyle BrodziakGWGAssists: Nick Schultz, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 6:33MINJared SpurgeonPPAssists: Marek Zidlicky, Pierre-Marc Bouchard · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P3 14:33MINPierre-Marc BouchardAssists: Cal Clutterbuck, John Madden · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 0:16EDMTaylor Chorney: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 4:55EDMAndrew Cogliano: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 11:48MINCam Barker: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 14:14MINClayton Stoner: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:55MINAndrew Brunette: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 5:26EDMTheo Peckham: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 10:07EDMJean-Francois Jacques: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 11:39MINBrent Burns: Holding2 min
  9. P3 12:09MINMarek Zidlicky: Holding2 min
  10. P3 15:17EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 15:17MINBrad Staubitz: Charging2 min
  12. P3 15:17EDMJean-Francois Jacques: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 15:17MINBrad Staubitz: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 15:17MINPierre-Marc Bouchard: Delaying game bench2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
47% to win53% to win
← EDM attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Almond won the faceoff against Reddox
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMMIN
21Shots on goal23
1.8Expected goals1.9
41Shot attempts49
26Faceoffs won34
6Power plays4
20Penalty minutes24
17Hits17
12Blocked shots10
9Giveaways7
0Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestJacques – Jones – Reddox7:07

    xG 0.31–0.07 (81%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Horcoff – Hemsky – Penner9:49

    xG 0.31–0.23 (58%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Cogliano – Eberle – Hall11:52

    xG 0.25–0.27 (48%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

  4. Gagner – Omark – Paajarvi9:11

    xG 0.13–0.46 (22%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestVandermeer – Peckham3:56

    xG 0.46–0.09 (83%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  2. Smid – Peckham2:59

    xG 0.03–0.03 (49%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Foster – Gilbert2:59

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrunette – Cullen – Miettinen9:46

    xG 0.29–0.08 (78%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  2. Madden – Nystrom – Clutterbuck8:33

    xG 0.12–0.06 (66%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Havlat – Bouchard – Almond3:16

    xG 0.17–0.14 (55%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  4. Nystrom – Staubitz – Almond3:11

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZanon – Stoner13:45

    xG 0.47–0.12 (80%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Zidlicky – Spurgeon5:30

    xG 0.11–0.01 (92%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Burns13:28

    xG 0.36–0.34 (51%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.9 xGEDM 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 38/100 · #731 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.27 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).